You must be joking. Deadstar was lightweight pop. The Breeders were an offshoot of the Pixies, i.e. not pop. Kim Deal was just as good a song writer as Charles ever was. "Last Splash" was one of the greatest albums ever.
September 29, 2025 at 8:28 AM
You must be joking. Deadstar was lightweight pop. The Breeders were an offshoot of the Pixies, i.e. not pop. Kim Deal was just as good a song writer as Charles ever was. "Last Splash" was one of the greatest albums ever.
The defined benefit schemes closed around 1990-1992. The future fund has never paid out anything at all to anyone. Marles will probably decide that it now has to pay for AUKUS, or some bullshit like that.
August 10, 2025 at 3:09 PM
The defined benefit schemes closed around 1990-1992. The future fund has never paid out anything at all to anyone. Marles will probably decide that it now has to pay for AUKUS, or some bullshit like that.
The USS Nimitz, the US's oldest operating carrier, due to be decommissioned, is heading toward Iran right now. I suspect it's being sent for the precise purpose of being a target.
June 22, 2025 at 7:18 AM
The USS Nimitz, the US's oldest operating carrier, due to be decommissioned, is heading toward Iran right now. I suspect it's being sent for the precise purpose of being a target.
Firstly, Yglesias is an idiot. Secondly, the correlation between CEOs and prisoners is due to psychopathy/sociopathy, not IQ. CEOs and prisoners include more psychopaths/sociopaths than the general population.
May 15, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Firstly, Yglesias is an idiot. Secondly, the correlation between CEOs and prisoners is due to psychopathy/sociopathy, not IQ. CEOs and prisoners include more psychopaths/sociopaths than the general population.
This isn't going anywhere. Noether's theorem is more like "math that has fallen out of physics". And again, you can't tell a priori that it will apply to some new physical phenomenon.
April 26, 2025 at 9:46 AM
This isn't going anywhere. Noether's theorem is more like "math that has fallen out of physics". And again, you can't tell a priori that it will apply to some new physical phenomenon.
No, a famous example of this would be special relativity. In Newtonian gravity, there is no way to obtain the constant G without experimental measurement. Similarly, general relativity derivation relies on a few assumptions, but the math can't tell you a priori which assumptions are correct.
April 26, 2025 at 8:10 AM
No, a famous example of this would be special relativity. In Newtonian gravity, there is no way to obtain the constant G without experimental measurement. Similarly, general relativity derivation relies on a few assumptions, but the math can't tell you a priori which assumptions are correct.
Physics absolutely does not "just fall right out of mathematics". How does either Newtonian gravity or the general theory of relativity "just fall right out of mathematics"?
April 25, 2025 at 12:08 PM
Physics absolutely does not "just fall right out of mathematics". How does either Newtonian gravity or the general theory of relativity "just fall right out of mathematics"?