Puede ampliar información en este post de Pablo García (@pablogguz_) en @nadaesgratis.bsky.social, a quien agradezco que haya accedido a mi invitación a publicar en el blog:

nadaesgratis.es/admin/no-es-...

This year, the challenges include:
👉 #Norms and their implications for social #inequalities
👉 Social #mobility and its determinants: Evidence from #historic data
👉 #Genes-environment interactions and inequalities

💻More at dse.univr.it/it/

Orden y prosperidad económica (econ growth), sobre todo lo segundo.

Esto que dices es clave. Entre los chavales a los que doy clase el referente es *China*.

8/My remarks apply a fortiori to Summers' position as a commentary on American academia. His amorality/immorality end any credibility to his posturing on the failures of Harvard or other universities. The same holds for his posturing about the moral failings of the Trump administration.

7/If one thinks that the behaviors documented in the forthcoming American Economic Review paper "Gender Differences in Economics Seminars" function independently from the way prominent sexists are treated, that is simply naive.

5/ Please do not suggest that there is any sense in which Summers contributions are unique or essential, that is simply nonsense. It is not how social science works, with exceptions too rare to disprove a general rule.

4/ Summers is welcome to publish papers via peer review like anyone else. He should not be a leader of the profession, given plums such as invited publications, lectures, made integral to programmatic policy statements, etc. Doing so implies that gross sexism is regarded as triviality.