It was lower risk of death and MACE with BB after AMI.
Contrast to the outcomes in the REBOOT where there was harm in a subgroup of AMI and preserved EF.

Let's not throw the BB out just yet.

For cardiovascular surgery, this now begs an important question, when we see elevated GDF-15, is it a sign of pulmonary damage and right heart stress? Maybe, and this could be very useful.

What I find interesting was the pfe and post op levels, clearly showing the rise after procedure (not before), which means it could be iatrogenic.

LLM needn't be personally trained to be useful, true, but can also be superficial or miss creative triggers that only a human mind can achieve. AI is an efficiency tool for existing techniques (a sophisticated copycat) and useful for populating doldrums, and repetitive notions - immense value there.

I knew it was AI almost instantly, did it dig into the issue or accurately cover the surface, what do you think?