Prevention Factchecker
banner
preventfactchecker.bsky.social
Prevention Factchecker
@preventfactchecker.bsky.social
Countering misinformation about public health based approaches to the prevention of sexual abuse. Anti-censorship, anti-fascist, pro-LGBTQ+.
If by “that” you mean the prevention work that Nosferatu posted, the answer is yes. The Johns Hopkins school mentioned there was a collaborator. Unfortunately people took it all the wrong way and the rest is history. People really don’t want to hear that CSA is preventable or to think about how.
December 9, 2025 at 6:42 AM
Never suggested it.
December 9, 2025 at 1:38 AM
The research being undertaken on these devices does consider both positive and negative potential impacts. There is really no downside to promoting scientific research.
December 9, 2025 at 1:16 AM
I support them. What’s your stance on bullying people so hard they attempt suicide? (Not me, I don’t care at all what bullies say - but many trans and queer young people have been bullied into self harm by the likes of you.)
December 9, 2025 at 1:13 AM
So it’s even more important important to research whether they could be used for prevention, since adult sex doll owners do have potential legal sex partners, which exclusive pedophiles don’t.
December 9, 2025 at 1:09 AM
I mean, I have made the same terminological point as you many times (including today), but at a certain point it’s just bashing your head against a wall and you have to meet people where they are in order to communicate with them.
December 9, 2025 at 12:55 AM
It will never be legal and nobody is suggesting it ever should be.
December 9, 2025 at 12:43 AM
They advocated and raised money for research into whether the dolls could be used in prevention. Here is some of that research. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Exploring the Psychological Characteristics and Risk-related Cognitions of Individuals Who Own Sex Dolls
The ownership of sex dolls has become an increasingly controversial social issue over the last five to ten years, with many in society (and academia) calling for the criminalization of such dolls. ...
www.tandfonline.com
December 9, 2025 at 12:43 AM
{email_subject}
prostasia.org
December 9, 2025 at 12:26 AM
I agree it doesn’t, but most people misuse it that way.
December 9, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Mainly because of online abuse from people who believed conspiracy theories about it being pro-abuse. Read for yourself direct from the source: prostasia.org?na=archive&e...
{email_subject}
prostasia.org
December 9, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Nothing. It doesn’t even exist anymore.
December 9, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Nothing, it no longer exists. It used to advocate for CSA prevention.
December 9, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Fact-check: false. Prostasia never advocated for the legalization of child pornography nor described pedophilia in that way. You are copy-pasting from a smear campaign website.
December 9, 2025 at 12:17 AM
I don’t do either of those things.
December 8, 2025 at 11:57 PM
That the Tumblr user in OP screenshot was correct to say that children can be pedophiles. That’s true for 16+ year olds if you take the word pedophile literally, and it’s true for younger children if you take it as meaning a perpetrator of CSA.
December 8, 2025 at 11:54 PM
It’s child sexual abuse. Pedophilia is a mental condition, not an action. This is not a controversial statement.
December 8, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Really? Open your eyes.
December 8, 2025 at 11:43 PM
Yeah, if someone did that, that would certainly be bad. Good thing that I’ve never done that. Adult predation on minors is an extremely serious crime, as I have always maintained.
December 8, 2025 at 11:42 PM
Identify anywhere that I have ever done that.
December 8, 2025 at 11:33 PM
No, using it indiscriminately as a slur, like (but worse than) the “r” word is a form of sexualised verbal abuse.
December 8, 2025 at 11:29 PM
In 99% of cases when it is used online, yes. That should be obvious.
December 8, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Couldn’t care less. Were you not here for Ana Valens’ pedojacketing last week? It’s tine to drain baseless social media slurs of their force by ignoring them.
December 8, 2025 at 11:19 PM
No, taking baseless smears like “pedo” and “hard drive check” seriously only lends them credence that they don’t deserve.
December 8, 2025 at 11:15 PM
You are, but you are not worth engaging with further since your stated aim is just to goad me into blocking you. I am not going to give you the satisfaction, I am just muting you instead.
December 8, 2025 at 10:58 PM