Poggle's Garbage Service 🫡
banner
poggle-garbage-svc.bsky.social
Poggle's Garbage Service 🫡
@poggle-garbage-svc.bsky.social
Keeping people safe.

List titles, descriptions and list contents entirely the honest, subjective opinion of list owner.
At the end of the day, their only tangible justification that exists in reality for banning trans people from gendered spaces, is the same justification that race segregationists used to ban people of colour from "white people spaces".
November 3, 2025 at 6:14 AM
I thoroughly destroyed this person's exact anti-LGBT extremist talking points the other day, and they blocked me because when their "facts" didn't hold up under basic scrutiny, they just fell back on "I want trans apartheid because something something biological sex or whatever".
November 3, 2025 at 6:14 AM
Their extremist world view simply can't hold up to actual objective fact-based scrutiny, so rather than consider that they might have been lied to about trans people (and propagating those lies), they blocked.
November 2, 2025 at 8:45 AM
This woman may not have done anything violent. Could be fraud for all we know. And you'd put her in a men's prison.

You notice I'm rejecting your biological essentialist and scientifically illiterate "understanding" of sex, claiming that actual women with breasts and a vagina are somehow men.
November 1, 2025 at 10:29 PM
But seeing that the extremist straw man you built for me doesn't actually seem to be working for you, let's have a look at the exorcist steel man you built for yourself...

You would have a woman who grew up a girl, is a woman, has never known anything but being a woman & put her in a men's prison.
November 1, 2025 at 10:29 PM
Not least that trans femme HRT basically destroys ones sex drive and makes thi
"things" practically unusable. If someone did that for sex reasons they'd fucking hate it and desist long before they'd be transferred. It's likely why there weren't actually any issues with trans women prisoners on HRT.
November 1, 2025 at 10:29 PM
So you're using extreme examples to justify your own extremist position?

You wouldn't find a trans person on this planet who thinks that a prisoner should be allowed to "I'm trans" and to be transferred the same day. Longer-term medical transition would be a necessity for *anybody* to accept that.
November 1, 2025 at 10:29 PM
You just admitted that prison safety isn't really bothering you *that* much when it's cisgender on cisgender violence, but the moment you see a trans woman in a prison minding her own business your lose your fucking mind.

This is because you don't actually care about safety, you care about bigotry.
November 1, 2025 at 10:06 PM
You "we can't do anything about SA from staff, ohwell prison is supposed to be shit never mind"

Also you "I have zero evidence for it, but I'm going to pretend that prison safety is suddenly super important to me so I can do a secret bigotry against a minority group"
November 1, 2025 at 10:06 PM
The study you cling to doesn't break this down into subcategories, but given that sex work has become so necessary for trans women to literally survive, it wouldn't suprise me at all if most of the number you cited were caught doing prostitution in order to put food on the table.
November 1, 2025 at 9:57 PM
It's also a fact that sex work is categorised under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 category you cited, and given trans women are generally more prone to being forced into sex work because most regular businesses (about 2/3rds by last anonymous survey) won't hire a trans person.
November 1, 2025 at 9:57 PM
No, sorry, you didn't.

You mindlessly posted claptrap you found on an anti-LGBT extremist website without critically thinking about it, because if you did you wouldn't be so consistently wrong about your own evidence.

For one, the figures you showed don't show any offences in prisons, only out.
November 1, 2025 at 9:57 PM
All you're doing is looking at people you personally dislike because of bigotry and extremist rhetoric, and then working backwards based on hypotheticals to try and find a nonsense excuse for extremist opinions.

It's really obvious, and shows a blatant lack of morals on your part imo.
November 1, 2025 at 9:45 PM
"this would maintain sex segregation" despite no evidence for it being necessary.

Again, you're looking really silly by claiming that trans women are men. They're simply not.

There's also no documented evidence that transitioned women pose any risk to anybody in general pop women's prison.
November 1, 2025 at 9:45 PM
You're part of a movement demanding that trans people be forced into separate spaces away from the rest of the normal population.

If you don't think that's apartheid, then you either too illiterate to know the actual meaning of the word or you're just lying.
November 1, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Additionally, I think the fact that you dogmatically use the rhetoric and slurs that anti-LGBT extremists in their pro-apartheid talking points tells me that you either spend a lot of time around them, or spend a lot of time with someone who does...

I hope you get better soon.
November 1, 2025 at 10:33 AM
While you may not personally want ALL of these, but if you have 10 different groups demanding trans people be excluded from a different 1/10th of society, all members of those 10 groups are collectively calling for apartheid for trans people.

You are part of that push for trans apartheid.
November 1, 2025 at 9:59 AM
When you consider that extremists are saying, without evidence, that trans people should have their own toilets, their own changing rooms, their own sports teams, their own prison facilities, their own clothes shops, and banned from the "normal people" versions of these spaces, THAT is apartheid.
November 1, 2025 at 9:59 AM
When you force women with breasts and a vagina into men's prison, the only realistic option to reduce the risk is to put them into isolation - for possibly years.

Isolation that's typically only used briefly for prisoners who misbehave.

It's rightly considered torture to do this to anybody.
November 1, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Therefore, when you say you care about sexual abuse in prison, I simply do not believe a word you're saying, and I fully believe that you're this as an excuse for a very clear bigotry.

I also believe anybody else reading your words would come to the same sound conclusion.
November 1, 2025 at 9:59 AM
You do not seem to care that all SA against prisoners comes from staff.

If you divided your time talking about this abuse based on the percentage of who commits these abuses, you'd spend 100% of your time in staff, and 0% on trans people.

The fact that you spend 100% on trans people is telling.
November 1, 2025 at 9:59 AM
This is because you only really seem "care" about SA in prison in the context of completely *hypothetical* SA of cis women by trans women, while seemingly not caring about the proven realitythat trans women get SA'd in prison more than cis women, even in women's prisons (though lower).
November 1, 2025 at 9:59 AM
Please stop embarrassing yourself. You know full well that I'm referring to trans apartheid.

You're saying you want women with breasts and a vagina, who may have done something as minor as refusing to pay their TV licence, to be put in men's prison to be "v-coded" and raped to death.
November 1, 2025 at 9:59 AM
You're embarrassingly bad at this, because it's been disproven for years.

The actual evidence doesn't support any of your claims, which is why you're clinging to garbage data and "vibes-based policy"... just so long as those vibes are pro-apartheid.

Can't be true unless it's "trans bad", right...?
October 31, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Despite years of non-apartheid, sexual assaults in women’s prisons were committed by staff, not prisoners (see HMIP 2021, Prison Reform Trust 2022).

You're blatantly ignoring reality and cherry-picking terrible data to stigmatise trans people by pushing a disproven "danger to women" narrative.
October 31, 2025 at 9:18 PM