"An approximate cost-benefit calculation suggests firm owners have earned a cumulative return of 900 percent or more on the cost of this
training over seven years... without the need for asset or cash transfers"
openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/...

Congrats

Congrats!

On average across traits, the three methods produced remarkably similar estimates of ~30%. Most (~85%) of this variance could already be estimated by common variant GWAS run on the same samples. Strikingly, classical twin estimates for these traits were ~2x higher!

I was just thinking that ADHD/ASD might be the ones less likely to attrit

But yes, not a huge problem

How is the attrition in the answers to this survey wave?

Well, *rational* collective decision making is formally impossible.

Lots of irrational options are ripe for the taking

This is equally fascinating and disturbing.

Do you know how for-pay online surveys like prolific or others are handling this?

I want to read the rest!!! Couldn't find it with a quick browse online. Do you have a link by any chance?

Ah ok sorry

By academic relatives you also mean supervisors right?

But people choose supervisors because they like the topic, no? A lot of self-selecturing going on

And the article provides excerpts of summers end Epstein's messages that makes it abundantly clear that
1. Summers knew who he was talking to
2. Summers clearly hoped to trade feedback and connections for sex

Stop by Bologna on your way back 😉