Philipp Köncke
@philippkoencke.bsky.social
PostDoc | FSU Jena | Political Economy | Global China | Globalization | Editorial Board @prokla
Reposted by Philipp Köncke
Our results show how the party-state strategically mobilizes private and hybrid capital to develop green & digital high-tech (EVs, AI, renewables) – but under close party-state oversight and coordination.
July 30, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Our results show how the party-state strategically mobilizes private and hybrid capital to develop green & digital high-tech (EVs, AI, renewables) – but under close party-state oversight and coordination.
Our results show how the party-state strategically mobilizes private and hybrid capital to develop green & digital high-tech (EVs, AI, renewables) – but under close party-state oversight and coordination.
July 30, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Our results show how the party-state strategically mobilizes private and hybrid capital to develop green & digital high-tech (EVs, AI, renewables) – but under close party-state oversight and coordination.
Cluster analysis indicates three layers of "party-state permeation":
1️⃣State-dominated "commanding heights" (energy, transport, infra)
2️⃣Mixed-ownership innovation core (EVs, finance, ICT)
3️⃣Private-dominated sectors (retail, services, internet) – but still party-permeated
@isabellamweber.bsky.social
1️⃣State-dominated "commanding heights" (energy, transport, infra)
2️⃣Mixed-ownership innovation core (EVs, finance, ICT)
3️⃣Private-dominated sectors (retail, services, internet) – but still party-permeated
@isabellamweber.bsky.social
July 30, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Cluster analysis indicates three layers of "party-state permeation":
1️⃣State-dominated "commanding heights" (energy, transport, infra)
2️⃣Mixed-ownership innovation core (EVs, finance, ICT)
3️⃣Private-dominated sectors (retail, services, internet) – but still party-permeated
@isabellamweber.bsky.social
1️⃣State-dominated "commanding heights" (energy, transport, infra)
2️⃣Mixed-ownership innovation core (EVs, finance, ICT)
3️⃣Private-dominated sectors (retail, services, internet) – but still party-permeated
@isabellamweber.bsky.social
We built a novel dataset – SinoTop500 – covering China’s 500 largest companies. Results:
📌 A dual ownership structure (state and private equally dominating)
📌 But > 64% show high party institutionalization, including many private giants
📌 The CCP’s organizational reach goes far beyond SOEs
📌 A dual ownership structure (state and private equally dominating)
📌 But > 64% show high party institutionalization, including many private giants
📌 The CCP’s organizational reach goes far beyond SOEs
July 30, 2025 at 7:29 AM
We built a novel dataset – SinoTop500 – covering China’s 500 largest companies. Results:
📌 A dual ownership structure (state and private equally dominating)
📌 But > 64% show high party institutionalization, including many private giants
📌 The CCP’s organizational reach goes far beyond SOEs
📌 A dual ownership structure (state and private equally dominating)
📌 But > 64% show high party institutionalization, including many private giants
📌 The CCP’s organizational reach goes far beyond SOEs