Pat Furrie
@pfurrie.bsky.social
Pete, 2028. No compromises, no excuses.
#TeamPete #PeteBittigieg2028 #TeamPeteForever
Biden was a HUGE mistake...
#TeamPete #PeteBittigieg2028 #TeamPeteForever
Biden was a HUGE mistake...
I do know it, but I'm tired of fighting the character limit in this type of forum. However, he did say the first part, and that part is what he said first, as it is the most important part of it. You know he said it, and know he actually cares. But he also cares for everyone but you dismiss that.
August 3, 2025 at 12:16 PM
I do know it, but I'm tired of fighting the character limit in this type of forum. However, he did say the first part, and that part is what he said first, as it is the most important part of it. You know he said it, and know he actually cares. But he also cares for everyone but you dismiss that.
Let's see, from Pete's interview he says: "the approach starts with compassion. compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this." Yeah, I agree with that.
You seem to be "agree with me or you're horrible." So much for understanding.
You seem to be "agree with me or you're horrible." So much for understanding.
August 3, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Let's see, from Pete's interview he says: "the approach starts with compassion. compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this." Yeah, I agree with that.
You seem to be "agree with me or you're horrible." So much for understanding.
You seem to be "agree with me or you're horrible." So much for understanding.
Yes, I've already watched it.
The question remains.
The question remains.
August 3, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Yes, I've already watched it.
The question remains.
The question remains.
You're spot-on regarding the need for a candidate who we WANT in office, not just someone who isn't the other guy.
The GOP went for someone who was as extreme and divisive as possible. Some of us (many) are tired of divisiveness.
The GOP went for someone who was as extreme and divisive as possible. Some of us (many) are tired of divisiveness.
August 3, 2025 at 9:52 AM
You're spot-on regarding the need for a candidate who we WANT in office, not just someone who isn't the other guy.
The GOP went for someone who was as extreme and divisive as possible. Some of us (many) are tired of divisiveness.
The GOP went for someone who was as extreme and divisive as possible. Some of us (many) are tired of divisiveness.
If Bernie were "clearly and obviously" the better candidate, then he would have gotten the nomination. Leave the conspiracy theories and poor loserism to MAGA.
What "doomed" Hillary (and Biden) was their own egos.
What "doomed" Hillary (and Biden) was their own egos.
August 3, 2025 at 9:47 AM
If Bernie were "clearly and obviously" the better candidate, then he would have gotten the nomination. Leave the conspiracy theories and poor loserism to MAGA.
What "doomed" Hillary (and Biden) was their own egos.
What "doomed" Hillary (and Biden) was their own egos.
In what way did we lose Pete?
August 3, 2025 at 9:40 AM
In what way did we lose Pete?
Uncharted territory? Perhaps in US history, but it seems very familiar in mid-1930s Germany.
August 3, 2025 at 9:37 AM
Uncharted territory? Perhaps in US history, but it seems very familiar in mid-1930s Germany.
Obama's primary goal was to change the time in Washington. Less one party rule and more teaching across the aisle. Suggesting he was a fraud because he couldn't get to your particular agenda item is disingenuous. He wanted to be a team player, apparently that's not your thing.
July 30, 2025 at 8:16 AM
Obama's primary goal was to change the time in Washington. Less one party rule and more teaching across the aisle. Suggesting he was a fraud because he couldn't get to your particular agenda item is disingenuous. He wanted to be a team player, apparently that's not your thing.
Ah, an absolute purity test. Pete was obviously interested in empathy for all, not just for some. Too bad that isn't universal.
July 30, 2025 at 8:08 AM
Ah, an absolute purity test. Pete was obviously interested in empathy for all, not just for some. Too bad that isn't universal.
And you never answered the question about Obama.
July 29, 2025 at 11:51 PM
And you never answered the question about Obama.
Not at all. But this doesn't sound like an "attack" (your word):
I think the approach starts with compassion. compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them.
I think the approach starts with compassion. compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them.
July 29, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Not at all. But this doesn't sound like an "attack" (your word):
I think the approach starts with compassion. compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them.
I think the approach starts with compassion. compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them.
What did you think of Obama? Yes, it is pertinent to the conversation.
July 29, 2025 at 9:44 PM
What did you think of Obama? Yes, it is pertinent to the conversation.
Yeah, that doesn't sound like an attack.
July 29, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Yeah, that doesn't sound like an attack.
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
July 29, 2025 at 9:30 PM
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
July 29, 2025 at 9:29 PM
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
July 29, 2025 at 8:09 PM
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
July 29, 2025 at 8:08 PM
What statement did Pete make against trans people? Yes, I saw an interview from yesterday, just trying to be sure what *specifically* set you off.
Looking forward to the next election is good, though what's the issue with understanding what happened in the past? Isn't that how we learn? Isn't that how we avoid repeating mistakes?
July 29, 2025 at 8:06 PM
Looking forward to the next election is good, though what's the issue with understanding what happened in the past? Isn't that how we learn? Isn't that how we avoid repeating mistakes?
Logical : Yes
Factual : Yes
Willing to bring receipts: To what do you refer?
Cantankerous : Why?
Tough, yes. Principled: yes. Appropriately confident: yes. Bold: yes. Responsible: yes. Substanitive: yes. Respectful: yes.
Cantankerous: That doesn't win my vote... does the opposite.
Factual : Yes
Willing to bring receipts: To what do you refer?
Cantankerous : Why?
Tough, yes. Principled: yes. Appropriately confident: yes. Bold: yes. Responsible: yes. Substanitive: yes. Respectful: yes.
Cantankerous: That doesn't win my vote... does the opposite.
July 23, 2025 at 5:45 PM
Logical : Yes
Factual : Yes
Willing to bring receipts: To what do you refer?
Cantankerous : Why?
Tough, yes. Principled: yes. Appropriately confident: yes. Bold: yes. Responsible: yes. Substanitive: yes. Respectful: yes.
Cantankerous: That doesn't win my vote... does the opposite.
Factual : Yes
Willing to bring receipts: To what do you refer?
Cantankerous : Why?
Tough, yes. Principled: yes. Appropriately confident: yes. Bold: yes. Responsible: yes. Substanitive: yes. Respectful: yes.
Cantankerous: That doesn't win my vote... does the opposite.
Newsom has less chance than Biden. No more Biden.
July 23, 2025 at 5:43 AM
Newsom has less chance than Biden. No more Biden.