Only if I know very litte of the context of the paper’s subfield, and even then I subtract an “exaggeration-constant” from the significance (as I’m assuming that the paper’s authors wrote said statement) 🧐

I‘m so sorry that happened to you 🫂

Same difference: physicist vs. neuroscientist.

TBH I feel bad for people who tell me they hate(d) maths/physics in school. Very few kids intrinsically hate these, it’s more like the real magic when well explained. So what they had was a parent/ incapable teacher/? spoiling the magic for them 😓

Thanks for sharing your tea calendar 🤩. For not forgetting to add the alt text: it helped me a lot to set in the ”settings” -> ”accessibility” -> ”require alt text” on (I tend to forget about it too…)

From January 1st 2026, the CNRS will cut access to one of the largest commercial bibliometric databases, Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science, along with the Core Collection and Journal Citation Reports.

But… but… the function they used fits perfectly with everything in Fig 1 🤓

That’s one of the biggest reasons why I keep making my sourdough regularly. Typically it’s good or very good, but once in a while it’s just fucking delicious 😋

Thank you for sharing, a beautiful and soothing picture 🦉🌱🌾🌸