Party Mouse, PhD
@partymousephd.bsky.social
Novelist represented by @laurenbieker.bsky.social. Educational researcher focused on sense of belonging, ethics of AI in education, and disability justice/disability studies. Collector of overthought tattoos. Opinions my own.
The whole thing just stems from a fundamental underlying assumption that disability and academic success are incongruent. Take that assumption away, and none of their arguments make sense.
It's just ableism.
It's just ableism.
December 2, 2025 at 4:36 PM
The whole thing just stems from a fundamental underlying assumption that disability and academic success are incongruent. Take that assumption away, and none of their arguments make sense.
It's just ableism.
It's just ableism.
I have a 3rd position which is that I’ve devoted scholarly effort to understanding and researching it and the deeper I stare into the abyss the more I think there is an empty mind behind its gnashing teeth.
October 17, 2025 at 2:17 AM
I have a 3rd position which is that I’ve devoted scholarly effort to understanding and researching it and the deeper I stare into the abyss the more I think there is an empty mind behind its gnashing teeth.
For some, 4 v 4.15 matters a lot.
It isn't that you're wrong that for 86%-ish of people, this isn't the most salient issue.
It's that acting like it is a complete non-issue, or that people are "imagining" it, is going to (fairly) read as intensely condescending to the remaining 14% of people.
It isn't that you're wrong that for 86%-ish of people, this isn't the most salient issue.
It's that acting like it is a complete non-issue, or that people are "imagining" it, is going to (fairly) read as intensely condescending to the remaining 14% of people.
October 1, 2025 at 4:42 PM
For some, 4 v 4.15 matters a lot.
It isn't that you're wrong that for 86%-ish of people, this isn't the most salient issue.
It's that acting like it is a complete non-issue, or that people are "imagining" it, is going to (fairly) read as intensely condescending to the remaining 14% of people.
It isn't that you're wrong that for 86%-ish of people, this isn't the most salient issue.
It's that acting like it is a complete non-issue, or that people are "imagining" it, is going to (fairly) read as intensely condescending to the remaining 14% of people.
Asking ChatGPT a question is 10x more energy intensive than asking google the same question.
The google query contributes exponentially less CO2.
The google query contributes exponentially less CO2.
August 10, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Asking ChatGPT a question is 10x more energy intensive than asking google the same question.
The google query contributes exponentially less CO2.
The google query contributes exponentially less CO2.
Apologies I exaggerated slightly.
August 8, 2025 at 2:18 AM
Apologies I exaggerated slightly.