that's a valid contribution, however after comparing the revisions, OMITTING "gore, torture" etc does make me worry way more about the vague rules

... this being the largest instance and maybe even sole instance of their protocol means they can simply wipe anything the governments don't like off the face of the website

remember when people thought this was the perfect left wing alternative to twitter?

... just because it's not literally "can't draw or monetize", doesn't mean this is not just an attempt to make vague rules so the moderation team can get away with much more censorship and limitations

and despite them promoting themselves as decentralized...

... while the second rule can be used to strike down any drawing or post that goes any further than vanilla kinks, basic mormon shit, like say BDSM or even T4T, only because there's no EXPLICIT, STRAIGHT UP showcase of consent...

they are very vague, and when one mentions "appropriate age restrictions", it usually is linked to pornography laws in states and countries, and currently there are attempts to crack down on sex positive and LGBT content under the guise of limiting access to adult content "to protect the children"..

D1: "We allow consensual adult sexual content, including fictional depictions, when appropriately labeled and subject to appropriate age restrictions."

D2: "We do not allow sexual content involving non-consensual activity including synthetic, simulated, illustrated, or animated versions."