Omicron Data
banner
omicrondata.bsky.social
Omicron Data
@omicrondata.bsky.social
COVID Data Sharer and ADHD Twitterer

Likes: objective information, robust discussion and challenge.

Dislikes: offensiveness and rudeness

Trying to stay sane.
I wholly disagree that an inaccurate warning is better than no warning at all.

I'm unsure why this is contrived, the implication in your post was clear that the mental health impact of it was of no relevance, especially given the follow up.

Anyway we shall agree to disagree.
October 24, 2023 at 8:04 PM
Reposted by Omicron Data
You can be concerned about COVID impact and advocate for changes to public health policy without wilfully exaggerating it's risk, knowing (or ignorant to, not much better) the impact it could have on mental health.

Physical AND mental health = health.
October 24, 2023 at 7:34 PM
(ps suicides are a bad proxy for anxiety, given anxiety is not classically associated diagnostically with suicidal ideation)
October 24, 2023 at 7:45 PM
So because it's not *more* damaging (which no one ever said), the damage isnt something to be concerned about?
October 24, 2023 at 7:43 PM
Today for example I've already seen someone telling everyone who will listen that 2% of all people infected with COVID will die from it. 50x the actual risk. Is this ok? Do we think that this false information is cost neutral or negative to those already anxious about COVID?
October 24, 2023 at 7:37 PM
You can be concerned about COVID impact and advocate for changes to public health policy without wilfully exaggerating it's risk, knowing (or ignorant to, not much better) the impact it could have on mental health.

Physical AND mental health = health.
October 24, 2023 at 7:34 PM
So on average viral clearance (here defined as PCR Ct value >40) decreased from 9.3 to 6.6 days.
October 23, 2023 at 6:19 PM
Here you go, recent (start of October publish dat)!

www.nature.com/articles/s41...
October 23, 2023 at 6:18 PM
Incidentally the number of people who have messaged me directly talking (at length) about their mental health struggles to do with this is really surprising.
October 22, 2023 at 8:04 AM
Everything I've seen implies effectively no change.

Incredibly difficult to quantify though amidst a background of changing immunity, and particularly (and often understated) the shift in age profile of infection.

But probably implies no *sizeable* shift at least.
October 21, 2023 at 8:03 AM
Which itself massively stems from terrible reporting like "the forever plague"
October 21, 2023 at 5:53 AM
However, it probably does give it more exploration space.
October 21, 2023 at 4:45 AM
Personally...I dunno. It's a bit simplistic. Firstly ACE is being used as an almost linear proxy for transmissibility and that's not the case. Second, it assumes a more linear reduction in ACE post mutation, when that's not the case either.
October 21, 2023 at 4:44 AM
So in actually asked about this. The rationale is that ACE is used as a proxy for transmissibility, but only to a point (stupidly high binding doesn't increase it any further ). But, starting at a high level means evasive mutations can cost binding but not cripple the variant.
October 21, 2023 at 4:41 AM
Even if the views differed, that's not "attacking", that's disagreeing. Which is kinda one of the most fundamental requirements of scientific progress.

What a weird take from this person.
October 20, 2023 at 8:12 PM
Is it not more the entry method that causes greater severity, rather than variations in the level of ACE (especially when memory cells are established)?

Not a simple one measure metric either way of course.
October 20, 2023 at 7:54 PM
The question is, does it sustain at higher absolute numbers.
October 20, 2023 at 6:23 PM
Looks like some pretty high growth numbers (in absolute terms, unsure on relative) in England too.

So yes looking less likely to be outbreak based (solely at least).
October 20, 2023 at 6:20 PM
Yeh JN.1 looking interesting.
October 20, 2023 at 6:05 PM
Appreciate that, thank you ☺️
October 20, 2023 at 5:44 PM