Wouldn't they have barred them just think about it without having a conspiratorial lens on and about the rational facts. But even after that if you still think city are the goons then you can believe what you want

Uefa proved the non co-op charges and not the main ones regarding inflated sponsorship. But again you might have a different viewpoint which is okay. But just think about it would uefa just fine city for IF they wouldve proven city were guilty. IF uefa would've found them.guilty of the most serious

Again prove your claims. City financial statements are out there their accounts have been audited find them take em to courts and prove your claims and I'll be the first one to spag pel and city and whoever you want me to until then I'm not having it

I can hypothetically say Liverpool or United bribed a dozen refs to win their titles doesn't make them true and makes them.sound.equallh as ridiculous as your arguments I mean you can see the external viewpoint no?

Again these are all allegations not proven conjectures if you'd like to believe them you should but again I'd advice any sane person to believe in the rule of law otherwise we cannot function as a society. I mean wouldn't you agree?

Those are the basic principles of investment just look at any startup.stories say Uber. How does any company grow?? It all makes sense when you just realize it's people looking to make money

Again I have never insulted you during our discourse but you do you. Investment does wonders for any company ehh? Wonder what returns city are getting in return? Maybe check the valuation of the club i.e.what city are getting in response to the paid for now and maybe it'll make sense.

Ok man sure 😄

Again not proven. 115 verdicts not out yet so it's all allegations and I'll go with the principles of innocence until proven guilty because that is what keeps the world sane but you do you 🤷‍♀️

Have a go at my vocabulary I'm not that arsed mate. Compare the 4-6 billion over 15 years and that's what any other big club has spent so not having that as an argument as well backhanders not proven so I'm not gonna have an argument about that as well again ex-manager stuff not proven so ...

The incessant need to defend their favourite manager's legacy leads them to jump through innumerable illogical hoops to tarnish peps. It's quite pathetic to see it happen in real time. Football literally makes people quite silly

3> the fabled limitless resources that has led city being outspent by the likes of Birmingham city and city having no strikers for 2 years before erling and never truly having a specialized left back I for one am truly appalled by the reckless spending 💰💰

1> if he has cheated prove it. I'd happily accept any allegation proven in any court as that's how society works.

2> argh yes the famously bland football that has produced the likes of Messi and the fabled spain squad which dominated intl football.

Guardiola has won trebles with Barca and City and yet he cannot be considered a legend until he's won the league with stoke city 🤯. Name one other manager judged by those metrics it is an utterly pathetic argument.

I refuse to believe llama 3 came out in 2024 feels like ages tbh 😅

Hmmm replacing GANs with diffusion models was probably the most significant 🤔. Changed the way we think about modelling distributions explicitly.

Arghh great just what I was looking for thanks

Yeah the recent shift from both the academic and football twitter world was what convinced me to make the jump. seems noticeably better than the old regime :)

True 😊 would love someone to create one for diffusion/ flow matching maybe probably @hannes-stark.bsky.social his reading groups were amazing tbh.