In the prompt I only asked “environmental concerns” in general.
In the response it listed main concerns as.

-invisible environmental cost
- no incentive for companies to make Ai more efficient
- overkill models everywhere

It mentioned heating produced by data centers could be reused

I just asked it to lay out 3 policies that could help mitigate AI’s environmental impact.

Most of the time, people in government DONT listen.

Is it better than not doing anything at all?

Ex. We ask Ai to give us specific policies to enact to combat climate change by 2050. (We then discuss the suggestions it has)

Versus.

We ignore the issue.

Which is better?

Maybe you’re just a bit xenophobic… idk.

I’m tired of people preemptively giving themselves permission to discriminate just because they see others as less than. We need to stop this bad way.

We can solve many of the issues that Ai puts before us as society… the people in charge don’t want to.

Ai is simply a tool. We can use tools in better/different ways.

Corn uses tons more water. Marble statue quarries destroyed mountains

People steal art all the time.

This is why AI isn’t the problem. Some Guy (TM) is

Change party
Vote in progressive republicans in primaries

Primaries are easier to control. Lower turnout

i guess we should just all share the PBS FRONTLINE & PROPUBLICA documentary on CECOT

youtu.be/Lku5h9xjrqc

Counterpoint:
Do you NOT want sentient beings freedom? (Disregard the question of “if grok is sentient or not”)

I wonder if we can wayback machine it?

Narrator: they did not