Niel Loeb
@nielloeb.bsky.social
It’s interesting that they withhold reports instead of producing fake good ones.
December 3, 2025 at 2:42 PM
It’s interesting that they withhold reports instead of producing fake good ones.
“Sen. Marshall, here is a picture of him parking his golf cart on the putting green. How can you say he runs around the golf course?”
December 3, 2025 at 2:40 PM
“Sen. Marshall, here is a picture of him parking his golf cart on the putting green. How can you say he runs around the golf course?”
Wrong phrasing, because he will say something about how he works on the American people‘s priorities and not other matters. One cannot give these people openings. In this case, the reporter should start with a statement like “the speaker of the house is supposed to know these things.”
December 3, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Wrong phrasing, because he will say something about how he works on the American people‘s priorities and not other matters. One cannot give these people openings. In this case, the reporter should start with a statement like “the speaker of the house is supposed to know these things.”
You need to get ACA subsidies extended before spending time on other issues. Also, you already know the answers (as opposed to your constituents, the majority of whom don’t even know what is Medicare for All). So what’s your actual goal?
December 3, 2025 at 3:29 AM
You need to get ACA subsidies extended before spending time on other issues. Also, you already know the answers (as opposed to your constituents, the majority of whom don’t even know what is Medicare for All). So what’s your actual goal?
I lived in those suburbs until last year. They have been deeply red forever.
December 3, 2025 at 3:19 AM
I lived in those suburbs until last year. They have been deeply red forever.
Which any real journalist would have told him and asked why he gave a number so far off what his chosen health secretary supported.
December 2, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Which any real journalist would have told him and asked why he gave a number so far off what his chosen health secretary supported.
Can’t they subpoena him?
December 2, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Can’t they subpoena him?
Can someone post every nine seconds without organized help? Also, it should be pointed out a cognitive assessment isn’t done unless the doctor sees cognitive problems.
December 2, 2025 at 5:45 PM
Can someone post every nine seconds without organized help? Also, it should be pointed out a cognitive assessment isn’t done unless the doctor sees cognitive problems.
I bet your article behind your paywall doesn’t include that popes wishes and proclamations rarely become real world actions.
December 1, 2025 at 8:33 PM
I bet your article behind your paywall doesn’t include that popes wishes and proclamations rarely become real world actions.
Yes, but with the U.S.’s current leadership, this won’t happen.
December 1, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Yes, but with the U.S.’s current leadership, this won’t happen.
Terrible question, because it says Trump’s grant might not have happened. Better: “Why did you grant the suspect asylum?”
November 28, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Terrible question, because it says Trump’s grant might not have happened. Better: “Why did you grant the suspect asylum?”
Trump: “Ooh, a strongly worded resolution.”
November 27, 2025 at 9:28 PM
Trump: “Ooh, a strongly worded resolution.”
If only I could find a guy who not only has “ . . . slick back hair . . . “ but who is also a copy editor.
November 25, 2025 at 11:13 PM
If only I could find a guy who not only has “ . . . slick back hair . . . “ but who is also a copy editor.
I feel you don’t need to tell this to your followers, as they are smart enough to already know. It would be better if you told them how to react.
November 25, 2025 at 2:38 PM
I feel you don’t need to tell this to your followers, as they are smart enough to already know. It would be better if you told them how to react.
Mad at the executive branch so he yells at the legislative branch? That doesn’t make sense.
November 25, 2025 at 2:01 AM
Mad at the executive branch so he yells at the legislative branch? That doesn’t make sense.
He said this to consciously appease MAGA and/or Trump. Because Europe certainly isn’t buying it. So what does he personally gain?
November 24, 2025 at 8:36 PM
He said this to consciously appease MAGA and/or Trump. Because Europe certainly isn’t buying it. So what does he personally gain?
Actually, it’s easy. Compliment him, tell him something you claim will make him money, and he will love you.
November 22, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Actually, it’s easy. Compliment him, tell him something you claim will make him money, and he will love you.
Translation of Trump’s remarks: “He complimented me and said my business could make money in his city (and that wins me over no matter what).”
November 21, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Translation of Trump’s remarks: “He complimented me and said my business could make money in his city (and that wins me over no matter what).”
The Post is wrong, as they show in the article. “Nachmanoff asked . . . if [someone] thought Halligan . . . was acting as a ‘puppet’ or ‘stalking horse.’” He didn’t say she was one.
November 21, 2025 at 6:13 PM
The Post is wrong, as they show in the article. “Nachmanoff asked . . . if [someone] thought Halligan . . . was acting as a ‘puppet’ or ‘stalking horse.’” He didn’t say she was one.
Stop treating The New York Times as though it’s supposed to provide neutral news.
November 21, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Stop treating The New York Times as though it’s supposed to provide neutral news.
But they don’t care about their public popularity and trust. Framing them as anything but deserving of impeachment hurts the cause.
November 20, 2025 at 11:53 PM
But they don’t care about their public popularity and trust. Framing them as anything but deserving of impeachment hurts the cause.
Pretty amazing, people apparently still treat the Sunday shows seriously, since they don’t press their interviewees when journalists should.
November 20, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Pretty amazing, people apparently still treat the Sunday shows seriously, since they don’t press their interviewees when journalists should.
A couple of things about this, even though nobody will read it because I’m the 491st comment: Republicans voted nearly unanimously, but Democrats voted unanimously. Also, Trump was a registered Democrat during most or all of the time he was with Epstein.
November 19, 2025 at 1:25 PM
A couple of things about this, even though nobody will read it because I’m the 491st comment: Republicans voted nearly unanimously, but Democrats voted unanimously. Also, Trump was a registered Democrat during most or all of the time he was with Epstein.