My main question as a reviewer is: "is the claim well supported?"
I doubt current LLM's can reliably answer this. Can they?

no surprise (see figure 4)
ecoevorxiv.org/repository/v...

which journal and publisher ?

Instead the guy created a company selling "natural products"
bionyeri.com/about/

That's one of the major hypothesis for the explaining the strong, negative relationship between dN/dS and expression so I find this research super important

cool!
and very Lynch-compatible

I really had no idea about this. Thanks a lot!

Regarding coding seq mutations: have people considered a potential second-order fitness cost due to mutated proteins being around and interacting with undesired molecules?

Actually a number of committees now downgrade CVs including MDPI papers - I mean, not showing them is better

Here adaptation comes from killing the activity of a protein right?

I find this motto slippery. It should all be about good science, and teaching ERC otherwise seems no good for our future.

Archive link: archive.ph/xUITn

It's refreshing to hear about researchers putting in the effort to not pay APCs. You can still publish where you want by retaining your rights to do so -- lots of US universities already have rights retention policies enabling this. oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Univ...

Thanks! I need to read this carefully as it seems closely related to my recent
peercommunityjournal.org/articles/10....

Hi @ecologicalsociety.bsky.social

Any particular reason for having your annual conference sponsored by a predatory publisher?

direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
www.predatoryjournals.org/news/list-of...
ecoevorxiv.org/repository/v...
ecoevorxiv.org/repository/v...

I think paying for peer review is like using more pesticides when yields decline - you know, facing reality.