Thinks fall apart

Less than a quarter of the readership on this one is from UK, and the biggest chunk is from US. It's also not appearing in the print edition, afaik

It's written by the European community affairs correspondent and the Guardian commissions things online from its various offices, not all of which are presented through a UK lens

Can’t recall seeing anything like this from a tech company recently blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issue...

I guess assumption #1 could be argued to relate to a world in which Google turns off search results below, akin to what a full switch to AI Mode would be, plus no option to opt back or user desire to switch to rival search engine. The second is more fundamental though: the baseline is 15%, not 100%

Here is the Pew research

Yes, to be clear the situation is bad with potential to be much worse but there are a couple of false assumptions in Rusty taking the 1% figure to mean that. First, the one you mention. Second, that pre-AI clickthrough was 100% to a link

It reminds me of the bit in Serial s1 where they cannot establish whether there was a payphone at a certain Best Buy in 1999

OK it was an insert, which makes sense

www.404media.co/chicago-sun-...

Though this seems to be partly responsible
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrum_(...

Still, I suppose it beats "Laura Kuenssberg is going to be talking to a minister soon"