You think Hillary Clinton would’ve selected Supreme Court Justices that destroyed Roe v Wade? No

Then shut the fuck up and learn something

preventing disruption.”

First am rights are not absolute.

“If the comments disrupt your employer's interest in an efficient workplace, the speech may not enjoy First Amendment protections.”

“For a post made as a private individual about current events, your interest in exercising your right to free speech is weighed against your employer's interest in

IDGAF about Charlie Kirk getting shot, but if I was a lawyer at a university, I certainly wouldn’t say “he deserved it” on a public social media page

Republicans/racists work at all levels of government, so saying “he’s racist, he deserved it” would likely impair workplace relations / disrupt

if I was in trouble for shit posting on social media, I’d stop posting (under my real name) during the investigation

Government employees, social media and the first amendment

canons.sog.unc.edu/2025/09/gove...

He should put his account on private until his legal matters are resolved, what an idiot

#TheMoreYouKnow
#actuallyautistic #neurodiversity
#employment #socialmedia

That kind of harassment wouldn’t be so shocking for a 20 yr old college student, but for a 40 yr old lawyer to say that, publicly, it indicates an extreme lack of maturity and discretion

#JohnathanPerkins #UCLA should have known better than to post crap on social media which can harm his employers reputation

The misogynistic posts about harassing women while shopping would be enough for me to fire him

Deleting your twitter account won’t help your case either

Employers can take action against employees for social media posts that… cause significant reputational harm to the employer.