For good reason. He’s been a useless president that has funded and supported the genocide since day one.
This is a trump deal whether we like it or not.
(From a non trump fan)

Name calling is the best you’ve got to make your argument? Go back to bed Igo. You do the trans debate no favours

Def of bigotry is ‘the fact of having and expressing strong, unreasonable beliefs and disliking other people who have different beliefs or a different way of life’

You seem to be the one suffering from bigotry. I don’t dislike anyone in this debate, or feel the need to resort to name calling

I’m not trying to fool anyone. Having a reasoned debate in this topic is difficult without being called a bigot.
I feel sorry for politicians having to make these decisions. As I said….i hope they do so with the best intentions of all the kids affected.

I’m not choosing it. Politicians are choosing it. How they came to that decision is up to them but you would hope it is well intended
None of it has been debunked, there are a lot of people that disagree with it surely but that’s different from being debunked.

Again, name calling is a little childish when it comes to such a serious issue. The report was carried out over many years looking at lots of scientific evidence. If you don’t agree with it then that’s a different argument.

Politicians need to base their decisions on what experts are telling them

I actually am interested. I’ve read half of it already.
Merely advising you that resorting to name calling of someone with the qualifications of Dr Cass does not benefit your argument in anyway

When you resort to name calling it does nothing to enhance your argument in the real world.

Rather than a Tory tool, she is one of the most decorated and trusted minds in paediatrics in UK. That you disagree with her does not change that

I read it alright. My point still stands though. If the medical experts that were ‘skewering’ the Cass report, took time and effort to produce a detailed report to show there were no long term effects of taking PB’s, then I’m sure that would be considered by politicians also.
No?

It’s a very divisive issue so was always going to result in advocates taking aim at some aspects.
But it still begs the question - who should politicians base their decisions on? Medical experts and detailed reports or advocates with opposing views?

Very cool post 👏🏼
Nothing quite as satisfying as seeing nature come back to life

The problem is that Far right actors are supposed to have shaved heads and swastika tattoos. Not long blonde hair and articulate reasoning powers

They’re in a difficult position. Should politicians not follow medical advice from experts

16deg going home in Dublin yesterday evening at 6pm. Very weird feeling

In a 3 week contest, the real person often comes shining through. What a horrible way to treat someone so upset.
And we thought Leo lacked empathy? He was a mother Teresa compared to this guy

Always enjoyable to see Clarkson getting his ass handed to him

I’ve worked on a few projects where they have teams of engineers and labourers flown in from China. The work ethic is second to none.
Perhaps we should look at that instead of hiring the usual eejits like BAM in ireland

RIP
But that story is not very credible. I believe he was under pressure for a whole other reason related to his work in this case