Nav
ncattry116.bsky.social
Nav
@ncattry116.bsky.social
work in advertising | watch too much soccer | lineup graphic expert
Everton: the fonts don’t work together. The background is fine and if the lineup was centered, it could’ve looked nice. Player pic is whatever. Feels too crowded on the left.
Grade: C+

x.com/everton/stat...
August 24, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Forgot to finish last week! Final 2 grades!

#LUFC: this is incredibly boring. The fonts are nice but thats the thing I can really comment on.
Grade: C+
📋 Your #LUFC XI
August 24, 2025 at 3:44 PM
Arsenal: Too much going on. Font is awful, too big, and poorly spaced. Background has too many elements. Subs and anything in white gets lost. Could be better with a different pic. Also Odegaard can't pull off that look (not affecting grade).
Grade: C
x.com/Arsenal/stat...
August 17, 2025 at 2:46 PM
Manchester United: This is hard to read. The number font is not great but also too big, making the lineup area feel busy. My eye doesn't know where to go. Subs aren't integrated well. The starting font is awful. The player pic is really noisy.
Grade: C
x.com/ManUtd/statu...
August 17, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Brentford: I like the background pic and I like how subtle the text elements are but they don't work together. The text gets lost but it has potential with a different pic. I like the number above the name, haven't really seen that before.
Grade: B+
x.com/BrentfordFC/...
August 17, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Nottingham Forest: This is fine. The distressed look is light here so it works. I don't like how XI is styled - feels out of place. The lines on the left don't add anything. The font is not the best choice unless you space out the text more.
Grade: B
x.com/NFFC/status/...
August 17, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Crystal Palace: Player pic works. I like the idea of the golden glow on the left but it doesn't work with the background. Font is fine but the weight is hard to read for subs. "Chelsea Palace" reads weird to me. Not bad but needs a bit of work.
Grade: B-
x.com/CPFC/status/...
August 17, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Chelsea: Real jump scare with the Maresca picture. But like this a lot! Layout is great. Good mix of fonts. The background texture adds visual interest. But big minus points for Maresca and very poor lighting in player pics, lowering the grade.
Grade: B+
x.com/ChelseaFC/st...
August 17, 2025 at 2:19 PM
Man City: omg what. I think this would be perfect if we didn’t have full pictures of the players. The slight texture behind the player pics is nice. The colors pop nicely. The signatures are random but they add nice texture. It feels clean but not sterile.
Grade: A-
First game, first starters 🫡
August 16, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Wolves: I want to like this but I don’t. I like the use of the orange and how the numbers are styled. The spacing between the names are too close. I hate the effect on the player pic. I don’t like the font. It’s a basic layout.
Grade: C+
x.com/wolves/statu...
August 16, 2025 at 4:16 PM
#BurnleyFC: Not my favorite. Making starting XI, the player names, and numbers all the same weight looks bad. Maybe too many shades of pink. Fonts are slightly too big. The pink squares at the top are random. Has potential but needs editing.
Grade: C
x.com/BurnleyOffic...
August 16, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Spurs: Feel like this was the same as last year? Don't love it. I really like the fonts and the color of the fonts. But the faded XI feels unnecessary and out of place. I like the vibe of the player pic but could be more interesting.
Grade: C+
x.com/SpursOfficia...
August 16, 2025 at 2:35 PM
West Ham: I know this is based on their away kit but it's barely reading as West Ham. They didn't light their player well. I don't like the font and don't think it should be the only font used here. The sub section is crowded. This is ugly.
Grade: C
x.com/WestHam/stat...
August 16, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Sunderland: The most basic layout and it's so boring. The numbers not being aligned bothers me. I don't think this font should be used across the entire graphic. Player pic with a gray background is uninspiring. Could be any club's graphic.
Grade: C-
bsky.app/profile/safc...
Your Premier League Sunderland! 😍
August 16, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Fulham: Wild player pic choice my god. It made me laugh and not in a good way. I couldn't tell you this was Fulham and I don't like that. I like the placement and layout of all of the text on this. It's kind of nice but it also feels incomplete.
Grade: C+
x.com/FulhamFC/sta...
August 16, 2025 at 2:24 PM
BHAFC: Proportions are off and the colors are a lot. The n in line being a different font looks stupid. I didn't even notice the subs at first. The names are too small and hard to read. I like the background but it gets busy with the player boxes.
Grade: C
x.com/OfficialBHAF...
August 16, 2025 at 2:19 PM
NUFC: I like this but can they make it this nice every week? I don't know. I love the top. I love how the jersey is featured behind the line up. The fonts are boring but they shouldn't be the focal point of this. It feels balanced and clean.
Grade: B
bsky.app/profile/newc...
Your opening day Magpies! 👊
August 16, 2025 at 2:13 PM
Aston Villa: I don't like this layout so I dislike this. the black pattern behind the pic is so distruptive. I don't love the fonts. I like the integration of the crest on the right. But the way to save this is to remove the pic & black block.
Grade: C+
x.com/AVFCOfficial...
August 16, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Bournemouth: like the idea of this but it's very overwhelming. I like the idea of personality pics but the lack of consistency makes it busy. I like how the information is contained. but the hierarchy is off with numbers bigger than the names.
Grade: B-
x.com/afcbournemou...
August 16, 2025 at 1:53 PM