Is movement discipline necessary? Absolutely, but there needs to be an element of unpredictability that makes your opponent so scared of the punch, that they remain anxious to when it will finally be delivered.

This next take might seem idealistic, but it still needs to be said:

Political movements should always have a hint of spontaneity behind them.

Structured, hierarchal strategies have resulted in radical grassroots movements getting crushed repeatedly. The left can't make that mistake again.

I wrote some words on this if it interests you. I think this all a preview of what the world would look like under Oligarchic Anarchy, which seems to exist now. These guys don't know the meaning of no.

An Anarchy of Ecology is build on the principles of of an ecological sensibility.

Practices like unity in diversity, mutual aid, jineology, usufruct, and the resacralization of nature.

The abolition of hierarchy and working to create a "world where many worlds exist."

Epstein's perversion is an example of patriarchy taken to one of its most extremes, and a misogyny that takes the dehumanization of women/girls to the most extreme.

This is the world offered by Oligarchy. This is their anarchy.

We need to fight for an Anarchy of Ecology.