Nat Hansen
@nathansen.bsky.social
Philosopher at the University of Reading (UK) working on new wave ordinary language philosophy, experimental semantics and pragmatics, and some aesthetics.
I haven't read this yet, but there might be some relevant stuff on "oh" in here:
academic.oup.com/book/45560
academic.oup.com/book/45560
The Grammar of Interactives
Abstract. The concern of the book is with identifying a domain of discourse processing referred to as ‘interactive grammar’. The book rests on the analysis
academic.oup.com
September 11, 2025 at 7:15 PM
I haven't read this yet, but there might be some relevant stuff on "oh" in here:
academic.oup.com/book/45560
academic.oup.com/book/45560
Thank you Farah, it was great working with you on this!
September 11, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Thank you Farah, it was great working with you on this!
Reposted by Nat Hansen
Yes, I think there have been more and more good subdiscipline open access journals. They are all worth taking seriously!!
A partial list:
liao.shen-yi.org/openaccess/
I've also tried to, individually, submit more to these journals.
A partial list:
liao.shen-yi.org/openaccess/
I've also tried to, individually, submit more to these journals.
Open Access Journals (That I Like)
A partial list of 'platinum' or 'diamond' open access journals in or near philosophy
liao.shen-yi.org
September 8, 2025 at 2:55 PM
Yes, I think there have been more and more good subdiscipline open access journals. They are all worth taking seriously!!
A partial list:
liao.shen-yi.org/openaccess/
I've also tried to, individually, submit more to these journals.
A partial list:
liao.shen-yi.org/openaccess/
I've also tried to, individually, submit more to these journals.
Yeah I think "epistemic backchannel" is hers, but "backchannel" is from linguistics/conversational analysis
September 7, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Yeah I think "epistemic backchannel" is hers, but "backchannel" is from linguistics/conversational analysis
There's also this forthcoming paper: philpapers.org/rec/NAGCKA
But I thought you were identifying a way that "oh" used by the speaker may differ from the audience use of "oh" to signal novelty in the backchannel.
But I thought you were identifying a way that "oh" used by the speaker may differ from the audience use of "oh" to signal novelty in the backchannel.
Jennifer Nagel, Common Knowledge and its Limits - PhilPapers
What is common knowledge? According to the dominant iterative model, a group of people commonly knows that p if and only if they each individually know that p, and they furthermore ...
philpapers.org
September 7, 2025 at 5:04 PM
There's also this forthcoming paper: philpapers.org/rec/NAGCKA
But I thought you were identifying a way that "oh" used by the speaker may differ from the audience use of "oh" to signal novelty in the backchannel.
But I thought you were identifying a way that "oh" used by the speaker may differ from the audience use of "oh" to signal novelty in the backchannel.
A lot of work to be done around here! I’ve been trying to write a little section of this big thing I’m working on on the various roles of the discourse marker “you know”
September 4, 2025 at 9:50 PM
A lot of work to be done around here! I’ve been trying to write a little section of this big thing I’m working on on the various roles of the discourse marker “you know”
Oh, do you know Jennifer Nagel's work on the role of "oh" in the "epistemic backchannel"? (I know you're talking about a speaker use of the term, but it might be a place to start)
September 4, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Oh, do you know Jennifer Nagel's work on the role of "oh" in the "epistemic backchannel"? (I know you're talking about a speaker use of the term, but it might be a place to start)
This is the best thing on bluesky, thank you for posting these slices of California
August 12, 2025 at 6:26 AM
This is the best thing on bluesky, thank you for posting these slices of California
Max de Gaynesford has a book on poetry (philpapers.org/rec/DEGTRI-2)
Maximilian De Gaynesford, The Rift In The Lute: Attuning Poetry and Philosophy - PhilPapers
What is it for poetry to be serious and to be taken seriously? What is it to be open to poetry, exposed to its force, attuned to what it says and ...
philpapers.org
August 8, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Max de Gaynesford has a book on poetry (philpapers.org/rec/DEGTRI-2)
Great to see that this is out!
August 7, 2025 at 1:28 AM
Great to see that this is out!
I tried to comment on the serious part not the joke part but it’s late where I am
August 2, 2025 at 7:46 AM
I tried to comment on the serious part not the joke part but it’s late where I am
I could be wrong, but I think the finding is more about cultural variation in responses to Gödel-"style" cases than about Gödel himself, since the replication finds cultural differences also with the "super dog race" example from li et al (2018) designed to be useable with kid participants
August 2, 2025 at 7:34 AM
I could be wrong, but I think the finding is more about cultural variation in responses to Gödel-"style" cases than about Gödel himself, since the replication finds cultural differences also with the "super dog race" example from li et al (2018) designed to be useable with kid participants
At Chicago we had epistemic metaphysics
July 29, 2025 at 3:27 AM
At Chicago we had epistemic metaphysics