@natedaag.bsky.social
Sadly that's kind of the most likely outcome at this point.
December 1, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Sadly that's kind of the most likely outcome at this point.
Correct. I didn't, for the reason stated. My comment was about the headline. Notice?
November 30, 2025 at 9:29 AM
Correct. I didn't, for the reason stated. My comment was about the headline. Notice?
Who isn't a winnable candidate? Buttigieg? Why? Because he's gay? Anyone who can talk about REAL issues like that is capable of winning. Obama could and plenty of people were skeptical that a black man could win.
November 30, 2025 at 9:27 AM
Who isn't a winnable candidate? Buttigieg? Why? Because he's gay? Anyone who can talk about REAL issues like that is capable of winning. Obama could and plenty of people were skeptical that a black man could win.
Disagree w your premise. "Talking the language of mamdani" does not win in Michigan.
November 30, 2025 at 9:23 AM
Disagree w your premise. "Talking the language of mamdani" does not win in Michigan.
Mamdani can win in NYC, sure. So can AOC. But in Michigan? I'd have to see a FEW polls before I'd believe it.
November 30, 2025 at 9:20 AM
Mamdani can win in NYC, sure. So can AOC. But in Michigan? I'd have to see a FEW polls before I'd believe it.
In fairness - it is a stupid question. We know WHY Trump blamed Biden... No reason to ask that.
November 28, 2025 at 2:15 PM
In fairness - it is a stupid question. We know WHY Trump blamed Biden... No reason to ask that.
This press? Dream on.
November 28, 2025 at 2:10 PM
This press? Dream on.
Buttigieg isn't even on the headline? Not a serious article.
November 28, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Buttigieg isn't even on the headline? Not a serious article.
That's cute. Who leads that fight? The press? Chuck schumer?
November 27, 2025 at 8:32 PM
That's cute. Who leads that fight? The press? Chuck schumer?
In fact if she doesn't do that she's just another pedophile protector. Just ask her '28 opponent.
November 25, 2025 at 2:49 PM
In fact if she doesn't do that she's just another pedophile protector. Just ask her '28 opponent.
Fuck comey. He's responsible for all this shit. "Her emails! Her emails!"
November 25, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Fuck comey. He's responsible for all this shit. "Her emails! Her emails!"
She is living in a third world country where they're still grateful for and awed by science.
November 21, 2025 at 6:11 AM
She is living in a third world country where they're still grateful for and awed by science.
If I had to guess I'd say some of scotus is on the list or at the very least sympathetic to those who are.
November 20, 2025 at 7:21 PM
If I had to guess I'd say some of scotus is on the list or at the very least sympathetic to those who are.
If there were no Dems on it you'd know it was a bullshit list. OF COURSE they will be from both parties and I expect from a wide range of industries. One common denominator - rich.
November 20, 2025 at 2:33 PM
If there were no Dems on it you'd know it was a bullshit list. OF COURSE they will be from both parties and I expect from a wide range of industries. One common denominator - rich.
Of course they'd have the luxury of having 3 weeks to report on it because they wouldn't have to report on Obama and the Dems actively trying to burn the Republic to the ground.
November 18, 2025 at 1:01 PM
Of course they'd have the luxury of having 3 weeks to report on it because they wouldn't have to report on Obama and the Dems actively trying to burn the Republic to the ground.
It's weird to me that the only person to suffer consequences related to all those deeds - the only one likely to ever suffer consequences - is a woman. I'm not saying she doesn't deserve what she got, but can't a man - any man really - get some consequences too?
November 13, 2025 at 1:51 PM
It's weird to me that the only person to suffer consequences related to all those deeds - the only one likely to ever suffer consequences - is a woman. I'm not saying she doesn't deserve what she got, but can't a man - any man really - get some consequences too?
IMO Fetterman went further than "not voting party lines." Undermining all Dems in the same week they won actual elections due to the shutdown - same week tRump was arguing to the supreme court that he had the right to starve Americans... And this in addition to his previous betrayals.
November 13, 2025 at 1:42 PM
IMO Fetterman went further than "not voting party lines." Undermining all Dems in the same week they won actual elections due to the shutdown - same week tRump was arguing to the supreme court that he had the right to starve Americans... And this in addition to his previous betrayals.
I'll tell you 💯 they won't kill the filibuster. Hasn't happened. Isn't happening. Won't happen.
November 13, 2025 at 1:34 PM
I'll tell you 💯 they won't kill the filibuster. Hasn't happened. Isn't happening. Won't happen.
"Focused speeches." That's cute.
November 12, 2025 at 10:10 PM
"Focused speeches." That's cute.
What's nonsense is thinking they would kill the filibuster. They wouldn't.
November 12, 2025 at 10:07 PM
What's nonsense is thinking they would kill the filibuster. They wouldn't.
It's nonsense.
November 12, 2025 at 2:39 PM
It's nonsense.
Every! F-ing! Time!
November 10, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Every! F-ing! Time!
That's cute. You claim to think that calling fetterman maga meant - maga. Clearly it's hyperbole, no? But he is a turncoat and a traitor to Dems. And he's willing to sit down with tRump, which possibly makes him not *not maga* right? Bub?
November 10, 2025 at 1:23 PM
That's cute. You claim to think that calling fetterman maga meant - maga. Clearly it's hyperbole, no? But he is a turncoat and a traitor to Dems. And he's willing to sit down with tRump, which possibly makes him not *not maga* right? Bub?
I have 2 blue senators and I've already called them and requested they oust schumer in favor of someone who will bring the fight to tRump and the repubs. What choice do I have but to do it again.
November 10, 2025 at 1:11 PM
I have 2 blue senators and I've already called them and requested they oust schumer in favor of someone who will bring the fight to tRump and the repubs. What choice do I have but to do it again.