Ìgg¥ Hðßð
@myarticles.bsky.social
Message for all you who visit this profile.
If you support Trump, Poilievre or Smith to name a few assholes, you are an asshole too.
Take Off EH!
Trumps not going to start SNAP. Written in Project 2025, SNAP was to be eliminated.
November 10, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Trumps not going to start SNAP. Written in Project 2025, SNAP was to be eliminated.
All this is because of Alberta!
November 10, 2025 at 3:31 PM
All this is because of Alberta!
Why is Trump and company still walking around and living?
November 10, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Why is Trump and company still walking around and living?
BAN "X". That is where 100% of the hate towards Canadian citizens come out of ALBERTA, and most of the fucking hatred is from Pierre Poilievre and Dannielle Smith along with their scabs.
November 10, 2025 at 2:46 PM
BAN "X". That is where 100% of the hate towards Canadian citizens come out of ALBERTA, and most of the fucking hatred is from Pierre Poilievre and Dannielle Smith along with their scabs.
And it begins, you think this is going to make Republicans stop their abuse, get ready, Trump will now poison you all to death.
November 10, 2025 at 2:09 PM
And it begins, you think this is going to make Republicans stop their abuse, get ready, Trump will now poison you all to death.
Trump's insider troops in the democratic party. Hang Them!
November 10, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Trump's insider troops in the democratic party. Hang Them!
I am happily banned from the USA. 😆
November 9, 2025 at 11:58 PM
I am happily banned from the USA. 😆
He's a fucking traitor working for Trump, along with Smith.
November 9, 2025 at 11:34 PM
He's a fucking traitor working for Trump, along with Smith.
When the Trump regime finds out you didn't vote for him, he will be sending a new police army out to remove you from this earth, in others words, he will kill you.
November 9, 2025 at 10:42 PM
When the Trump regime finds out you didn't vote for him, he will be sending a new police army out to remove you from this earth, in others words, he will kill you.
Trump wins.. America is left with nothing, you all might a well put a bullet in your own heads. Trump will destroy everyone of you.
November 9, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Trump wins.. America is left with nothing, you all might a well put a bullet in your own heads. Trump will destroy everyone of you.
As the public becomes increasingly discerning about the information they consume, it is imperative for organizations like Greenpeace to prioritize truth and integrity in their campaigns. Only then can they effectively champion their causes without compromising their credibility.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
As the public becomes increasingly discerning about the information they consume, it is imperative for organizations like Greenpeace to prioritize truth and integrity in their campaigns. Only then can they effectively champion their causes without compromising their credibility.
Greenpeace's contributions to environmental awareness are undeniable, but the organization must also be held accountable for its actions and claims. The recent legal setbacks serve as a reminder that advocacy must be balanced with responsibility.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Greenpeace's contributions to environmental awareness are undeniable, but the organization must also be held accountable for its actions and claims. The recent legal setbacks serve as a reminder that advocacy must be balanced with responsibility.
Transparency and accuracy are essential for maintaining public trust, and any erosion of these values can have long-term consequences for the environmental movement as a whole.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Transparency and accuracy are essential for maintaining public trust, and any erosion of these values can have long-term consequences for the environmental movement as a whole.
The accusations against Greenpeace raise broader questions about the role of advocacy groups in public discourse. While their work is undeniably important, the use of misleading tactics can undermine the very causes they seek to promote.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
The accusations against Greenpeace raise broader questions about the role of advocacy groups in public discourse. While their work is undeniably important, the use of misleading tactics can undermine the very causes they seek to promote.
Greenpeace's characterization of this verdict as an attack on free speech is a common refrain among advocacy groups facing legal challenges. However, it is crucial to distinguish between the right to protest and the responsibility to ensure that actions and claims are grounded in truth.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Greenpeace's characterization of this verdict as an attack on free speech is a common refrain among advocacy groups facing legal challenges. However, it is crucial to distinguish between the right to protest and the responsibility to ensure that actions and claims are grounded in truth.
The recent jury verdict against Greenpeace highlights the potential legal consequences of such tactics. In this particular case, the organization was found liable for damages resulting from a protest, a decision that underscores the importance of accountability in activism.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
The recent jury verdict against Greenpeace highlights the potential legal consequences of such tactics. In this particular case, the organization was found liable for damages resulting from a protest, a decision that underscores the importance of accountability in activism.
While such tactics can be effective in capturing public attention, they can also lead to a distortion of facts, which is a concern that has been raised in various legal and public forums.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
While such tactics can be effective in capturing public attention, they can also lead to a distortion of facts, which is a concern that has been raised in various legal and public forums.
For instance, Greenpeace has been known to use vivid imagery and alarming rhetoric to convey the urgency of environmental crises.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
For instance, Greenpeace has been known to use vivid imagery and alarming rhetoric to convey the urgency of environmental crises.
The organization's history of dramatic protests and high profile campaigns has often drawn attention to environmental issues, but it has also led to accusations of sensationalism and exaggeration.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
The organization's history of dramatic protests and high profile campaigns has often drawn attention to environmental issues, but it has also led to accusations of sensationalism and exaggeration.
The Thin Line Between Advocacy and Misinformation
Advocacy groups like Greenpeace operate in a delicate balance between raising awareness and potentially crossing the line into misinformation.
Advocacy groups like Greenpeace operate in a delicate balance between raising awareness and potentially crossing the line into misinformation.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
The Thin Line Between Advocacy and Misinformation
Advocacy groups like Greenpeace operate in a delicate balance between raising awareness and potentially crossing the line into misinformation.
Advocacy groups like Greenpeace operate in a delicate balance between raising awareness and potentially crossing the line into misinformation.
The organization's response to such allegations has been to characterize these legal setbacks as attempts to silence free speech, a defense that, while potent, does little to address the core issue of the veracity of their claims.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
The organization's response to such allegations has been to characterize these legal setbacks as attempts to silence free speech, a defense that, while potent, does little to address the core issue of the veracity of their claims.
Greenpeace has been accused of spreading what some term as "fake news" and "maliciously misrepresenting events" to further its agenda. These accusations are not without merit, as evidenced by a recent case where a jury found Greenpeace at fault for damages caused during a protest.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Greenpeace has been accused of spreading what some term as "fake news" and "maliciously misrepresenting events" to further its agenda. These accusations are not without merit, as evidenced by a recent case where a jury found Greenpeace at fault for damages caused during a protest.
... recent legal proceedings and public statements have cast a shadow over the organization's reputation, with critics accusing it of employing tactics that some might argue are more aligned with propaganda than principled activism.
November 9, 2025 at 10:27 PM
... recent legal proceedings and public statements have cast a shadow over the organization's reputation, with critics accusing it of employing tactics that some might argue are more aligned with propaganda than principled activism.