ok, thanks - I've tried to get that across in 'be problem focused' section, but I'll look again at this. I agree with what you are saying, so feedback on whether it's clear is helpful.

Yes absolutely - definitely no ‘one sizes fits all’. But for a sizeable number of people it helped.

Striking the right balance is always a challenge - I get feedback about being too negative too.

FE is the place where we have the best evidence of timesaving, particularly with Teachermatic through our pilot and others.

I think so. This is the press release - it feels like AI-powered was shoehorned in so it would get press attention.

www.gov.uk/government/n...

I’m guessing it really means ‘using maths’ rather than Gen AI.

We (Jisc) do for colleges. We don’t separate Welsh students and teachers from others in our reports, and it’s a very mixed picture, with concerned mostly being centred are jobs.

Oh! Now you point it out, our research team’s email address doesn’t look right here! I’ll mention this to them. It’s definitely not market research! We just want to get a range of views to help Medr prioritise activities.

There are similar issues with, say, Turnitin. We want to get these discussions in right at the start this time rather than when it’s too.

We really want engagement from critical voices.

Thats the kind of thing we want the pilot participants to answer. We want to collectively work out the most responsible approach. There will be a lot of discussion as there are multiple places we need to consider this. Best way to contribute is engage with people in your uni running the pilots.

All sensible questions! We absolutely want students to be fully involved, and to help universities develop best practice. We know this is a complex area and the views and input from everyone is crucial.