@mungushughe.bsky.social
Ah, so you were pretending to be stupid? :)
That’s weird because I cited current biology :)
You cited medical terminology that doesn’t refer to sex :)
That’s weird because I cited current biology :)
You cited medical terminology that doesn’t refer to sex :)
November 27, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Ah, so you were pretending to be stupid? :)
That’s weird because I cited current biology :)
You cited medical terminology that doesn’t refer to sex :)
That’s weird because I cited current biology :)
You cited medical terminology that doesn’t refer to sex :)
Who did I degrade, asshole :)
November 27, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Who did I degrade, asshole :)
I absolutely can reject the fact that there is not gamete type in anisogamy. In fact, very two sexes evolved is a very famous topic on biology. By denying that anisogamy evolved you are denying evolution.
Like I said, when forced to make your own arguments… they are so weak…
Like I said, when forced to make your own arguments… they are so weak…
November 27, 2025 at 7:17 PM
I absolutely can reject the fact that there is not gamete type in anisogamy. In fact, very two sexes evolved is a very famous topic on biology. By denying that anisogamy evolved you are denying evolution.
Like I said, when forced to make your own arguments… they are so weak…
Like I said, when forced to make your own arguments… they are so weak…
Google “anisogamy” then cry harder. 😂🤦♂️
There are not three types of anisogamy. The fact that you don’t know the difference between anisogamy and isogamy is funny. What you’re trying to claim is there was a sex before sex evolved
So I‘ll ask again, what’s the third type of gamete in anisogamy? :)
There are not three types of anisogamy. The fact that you don’t know the difference between anisogamy and isogamy is funny. What you’re trying to claim is there was a sex before sex evolved
So I‘ll ask again, what’s the third type of gamete in anisogamy? :)
November 27, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Google “anisogamy” then cry harder. 😂🤦♂️
There are not three types of anisogamy. The fact that you don’t know the difference between anisogamy and isogamy is funny. What you’re trying to claim is there was a sex before sex evolved
So I‘ll ask again, what’s the third type of gamete in anisogamy? :)
There are not three types of anisogamy. The fact that you don’t know the difference between anisogamy and isogamy is funny. What you’re trying to claim is there was a sex before sex evolved
So I‘ll ask again, what’s the third type of gamete in anisogamy? :)
This is a non sequitur.
How do males and females prove there are more than two sexes?
How do males and females prove there are more than two sexes?
November 27, 2025 at 7:13 PM
This is a non sequitur.
How do males and females prove there are more than two sexes?
How do males and females prove there are more than two sexes?
You seem to be struggling. Please explain my comment to me.
The problem here is you have serious reading comprehension issues. You’re a hypocrite. I’m telling you that if you don’t shut the fuck up and stop dodging I’ll block you.
The problem here is you have serious reading comprehension issues. You’re a hypocrite. I’m telling you that if you don’t shut the fuck up and stop dodging I’ll block you.
November 27, 2025 at 7:12 PM
You seem to be struggling. Please explain my comment to me.
The problem here is you have serious reading comprehension issues. You’re a hypocrite. I’m telling you that if you don’t shut the fuck up and stop dodging I’ll block you.
The problem here is you have serious reading comprehension issues. You’re a hypocrite. I’m telling you that if you don’t shut the fuck up and stop dodging I’ll block you.
Why two sexes evolved has nothing to do with *genetic sex*. In fact, if your reading comprehension wasn’t so awful you’d know I pointed out that genetic sex doesn't refer to sex and is an outdated term…
PLEASE, read CAREFULLY next time. Please not if you do this again, I will block you.
PLEASE, read CAREFULLY next time. Please not if you do this again, I will block you.
November 27, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Why two sexes evolved has nothing to do with *genetic sex*. In fact, if your reading comprehension wasn’t so awful you’d know I pointed out that genetic sex doesn't refer to sex and is an outdated term…
PLEASE, read CAREFULLY next time. Please not if you do this again, I will block you.
PLEASE, read CAREFULLY next time. Please not if you do this again, I will block you.
No. That’s “genetic sex”. I said genetic sex
“Genetic sex” is not sex. The topic is the fact that there are two sexes. Not “genetic sex”.
This is the fourth time your reading comprehension has failed. Again, take a deep breath and read slowly and carefully….
bsky.app/profile/mung...
“Genetic sex” is not sex. The topic is the fact that there are two sexes. Not “genetic sex”.
This is the fourth time your reading comprehension has failed. Again, take a deep breath and read slowly and carefully….
bsky.app/profile/mung...
That’s finny because why only two sexes evolved is an extremely famous topic in biology :)
You’d know that if you studied it. In fact this is entirely consistent in taxonomy. In fact, any biology dictionary will show you are wrong.
But, do go on :)
You’d know that if you studied it. In fact this is entirely consistent in taxonomy. In fact, any biology dictionary will show you are wrong.
But, do go on :)
November 27, 2025 at 7:08 PM
No. That’s “genetic sex”. I said genetic sex
“Genetic sex” is not sex. The topic is the fact that there are two sexes. Not “genetic sex”.
This is the fourth time your reading comprehension has failed. Again, take a deep breath and read slowly and carefully….
bsky.app/profile/mung...
“Genetic sex” is not sex. The topic is the fact that there are two sexes. Not “genetic sex”.
This is the fourth time your reading comprehension has failed. Again, take a deep breath and read slowly and carefully….
bsky.app/profile/mung...
are you pretending to be stupid or are you stupid? “Genetic sex”, a medical diagnostic term, does not refer to the sex if an organism
November 27, 2025 at 7:06 PM
are you pretending to be stupid or are you stupid? “Genetic sex”, a medical diagnostic term, does not refer to the sex if an organism
What they would cause?
Oh really? How so? Pleas, explain what makes DSDs another sex. Be specific :)
Keep in mind DSDs are actually sex specific :)
Oh really? How so? Pleas, explain what makes DSDs another sex. Be specific :)
Keep in mind DSDs are actually sex specific :)
November 27, 2025 at 7:05 PM
What they would cause?
Oh really? How so? Pleas, explain what makes DSDs another sex. Be specific :)
Keep in mind DSDs are actually sex specific :)
Oh really? How so? Pleas, explain what makes DSDs another sex. Be specific :)
Keep in mind DSDs are actually sex specific :)
do you know what that means? It means that’s their system, not that they are sexes 😂🤦♂️
The system is entirely different. Read **all of it**
The system is entirely different. Read **all of it**
November 27, 2025 at 7:04 PM
do you know what that means? It means that’s their system, not that they are sexes 😂🤦♂️
The system is entirely different. Read **all of it**
The system is entirely different. Read **all of it**
That’s already been discussed. You’re resetting like a bot
November 27, 2025 at 7:03 PM
That’s already been discussed. You’re resetting like a bot
This has already been answered And you conceded “both” is not a sex someone can have
November 27, 2025 at 7:02 PM
This has already been answered And you conceded “both” is not a sex someone can have
Wait… please don’t tell me you think self gene is a social construct 😂🤦♂️
November 27, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Wait… please don’t tell me you think self gene is a social construct 😂🤦♂️
It’s funny you say this when Dawkins explicitly critiques social constructs and dismisses the claim science is a social construct.
So tell me, what does he say is a social construct? Go on :)
Like I said, it is *very easy* to tell when you don't know what you’re talking about
So tell me, what does he say is a social construct? Go on :)
Like I said, it is *very easy* to tell when you don't know what you’re talking about
November 27, 2025 at 6:59 PM
It’s funny you say this when Dawkins explicitly critiques social constructs and dismisses the claim science is a social construct.
So tell me, what does he say is a social construct? Go on :)
Like I said, it is *very easy* to tell when you don't know what you’re talking about
So tell me, what does he say is a social construct? Go on :)
Like I said, it is *very easy* to tell when you don't know what you’re talking about
again, since you keep dodging…
Define what a social construct is.
Define what a social construct is.
November 27, 2025 at 6:57 PM
again, since you keep dodging…
Define what a social construct is.
Define what a social construct is.
LOL just say you don’t know what science wars is. Hint: he was not on the social construct side.
Like I said, you outed yourself
Like I said, you outed yourself
November 27, 2025 at 6:55 PM
LOL just say you don’t know what science wars is. Hint: he was not on the social construct side.
Like I said, you outed yourself
Like I said, you outed yourself
Bible? LOL
See? You’re stuck with copy and paste. I’m a OhD candidate in biophysics. You can’t even get basic terminology correct.
See? You’re stuck with copy and paste. I’m a OhD candidate in biophysics. You can’t even get basic terminology correct.
November 27, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Bible? LOL
See? You’re stuck with copy and paste. I’m a OhD candidate in biophysics. You can’t even get basic terminology correct.
See? You’re stuck with copy and paste. I’m a OhD candidate in biophysics. You can’t even get basic terminology correct.
Settle down. Breathe. Read slowly
November 27, 2025 at 6:10 PM
Settle down. Breathe. Read slowly
No. Not to degrade them nor to weaponize them. To point out I don’t have memory issues.
Like I said, poor reading comprehension.
You‘ve literally failed to comprehend three comments now
Like I said, poor reading comprehension.
You‘ve literally failed to comprehend three comments now
November 27, 2025 at 6:10 PM
No. Not to degrade them nor to weaponize them. To point out I don’t have memory issues.
Like I said, poor reading comprehension.
You‘ve literally failed to comprehend three comments now
Like I said, poor reading comprehension.
You‘ve literally failed to comprehend three comments now
LOL. Fallacious argument. Intersex is not a sex. Can you even name four intersex conditions without google or are you just trying to weaponize people you can’t be bothered to learn about.
November 27, 2025 at 6:06 PM
See? Poor reading comprehension. Reread it again, slowly.
Hint: genetic sex isn’t sex 😂🤦♂️
Hint: genetic sex isn’t sex 😂🤦♂️
November 27, 2025 at 6:06 PM
See? Poor reading comprehension. Reread it again, slowly.
Hint: genetic sex isn’t sex 😂🤦♂️
Hint: genetic sex isn’t sex 😂🤦♂️
LOL. Fallacious argument. Intersex is not a sex. Can you even name four intersex conditions without google or are you just trying to weaponize people you can’t be bothered to learn about.
November 27, 2025 at 6:04 PM
Poor reading comprehension. Reread *what I wrote* 🤦♂️
November 27, 2025 at 6:04 PM
Poor reading comprehension. Reread *what I wrote* 🤦♂️
“That work won a nobel prize”
Annnnnddd there it is. You’ve never read it. It did not. Keep in mind which side Dawkins was on in the science wars. :)
Annnnnddd there it is. You’ve never read it. It did not. Keep in mind which side Dawkins was on in the science wars. :)
November 27, 2025 at 6:03 PM
“That work won a nobel prize”
Annnnnddd there it is. You’ve never read it. It did not. Keep in mind which side Dawkins was on in the science wars. :)
Annnnnddd there it is. You’ve never read it. It did not. Keep in mind which side Dawkins was on in the science wars. :)