The whole point of a pension is to defer the tax until you retire, when your pension becomes your income.

You don't/shouldn't pay tax up front, save for a pension when you could be enjoying the money today, then pay tax again on income in the future.

His mum is Prue Leith

Agree that it has drawbacks. But the majority of people are not abusing it and it still supports the industry.

I would prefer something with wider access for people for sure but people using it are not cheats and villains.

I don't care who takes advantage of C2W. It is a subsidy to the industry that badly needs it. If there is a better way to support bike sales, mechanics, shops etc. let's hear it.

Appreciate it excludes self employed but maybe (Idk) they have their own opportunities to limit tax etc.?

An evergreen choice. Feel it could be bigger on mobile in this instance but have lots to tidy up before optimising.

Trying to make UX and accessibility as good as possible but there's no help for the guff we write ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

Agree and don't see why there's no protected cycle lane on A25 Guildford > Dorking > Reigate. Busy commuter routes that would link well with A24 at Dorking

We're doing just that next April - five of us getting ferry to Dunkirk, cycle to de Panne, train to Ghent, then to Middleburg, Rotterdam and Amsterdam by bike, train back to de Panne. Looking forward to it a lot

Thanks for the info. I might give it a go and see how it looks.

To transition between pages on e.g. a blog that's served from a db (as per many websites)... is there a performance implication/penalty in using it? Esp. mobile and low bandwidth?

I know it's a common pattern but not convinced.

First, it's an annoying pattern full stop and I can't actually see the use case.

Second, a screenreader needs to know the menu is available and is in/out of view.

Third, the animation is poor for accessible reasons.

I could go on but...

Not sure about this annoyance for many people.

a) what is the benefit/use case of this?
b) how is it accessible?

Your suggestion to reduce driving associated taxes to increase growth is predicated on a car-centric model, when the majority of people live in cities where public transport and non driving travel would create broadest benefits. Long distance, rail capacity would be most effective IMO.

Yes, uses asides which I feel is wrong as it becomes a landmark to a screenreader for a discrete piece of information which might not make sense out of context. What I'm really looking for is a block level emphasis element I guess 🤣😓

Yep! Hopes and dreams Vs cold hard reality 😞

It's a big topic. This issue is telling a screenreader that the information has some emphasis on it without breaking the flow of the content. Blockquotes are for quoting external content and asides are for secondary observations, neither work here. Visually it's obvious, code wise it's not at all.

Forget about development costs. Technical debt kills every project, every time.