Mike Konczal
banner
mtkonczal.bsky.social
Mike Konczal
@mtkonczal.bsky.social
Econ person. Director of Policy and Research, @economicsecurityproject.org. Former NEC. #Rstats, dad, Chicago Guy. mikekonczal.com
Thanks for the insight!
November 8, 2025 at 1:02 PM
third kind: poster (VP Vance, FHFA commisioner Pulte)
November 4, 2025 at 11:03 PM
How good has plotnine gotten? I tried it a few years ago and thought it was at a good beginning but couldn't replace ggplot2, a sufficient reason for me to stay locked.
October 28, 2025 at 2:30 AM
Reposted by Mike Konczal
Also, no point arguing with obvious bad faith but I feel obliged to note that YIMBYs advocate for consistent, non-arbitrary, rule-bound development standards. Not for public servants to knock down whatever buildings they want with impunity to build a Bribe Cathedral.
October 25, 2025 at 10:35 PM
And synethesizing social insurance too! Thank you Sir. 🫡
October 24, 2025 at 11:31 PM
October 23, 2025 at 4:06 PM
I hope it sparks a lot of debate, and that you check it out! 9/9 economicsecurityproject.org/work/afforda...
Affordability - Economic Security Project
economicsecurityproject.org
October 22, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Meanwhile @vtg2.bsky.social and I have a discussion in @politico.com today that places the Framework a little more firmly in intra-Democratic policy debates.

(With a social preview image that strongly implies Ezra Klein was a White House aide.) /8

www.politico.com/news/magazin...
Abundance vs. Populism: A Former White House Aide Wants Democrats to Have It Both Ways
Democrats are promising to take on the high cost of living. Can they even agree on what’s causing the affordability crisis?
www.politico.com
October 22, 2025 at 5:23 PM
There's already some coverage:
@rcobooth.bsky.social wrote in @vox.com this morning describing our theory, and placing the Framework in this current political moment, while debating whether affordability can overcome just being another buzzword /7: www.vox.com/politics/465...
The buzzy word that Democrats have pinned their hopes on
Can “affordability” be more than just a campaign pitch?
www.vox.com
October 22, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Check it out! There's the one-pager, an executive summary, the full report, and the pdf (linked here) We'll be building on this through the next year, excited to hear what everyone thinks. /6 economicsecurityproject.org/wp-content/u...
economicsecurityproject.org
October 22, 2025 at 5:17 PM
We pull from the leading thinking across the schools of thought on affordability (e,g, social insurance, populism, antimonopoly, and abundance) and shows how they all do contribute to finding the best answers.

And none will do it alone; the answer won't just be Abundance. /5
October 22, 2025 at 5:16 PM
But even when markets work well, people may just not have the money they need.

That’s driven in part by inequality and big macroeconomic trends, but it’s also just built into how a market economy distributes income in our lives. Social insurance can fix these broken incomes. /4
October 22, 2025 at 5:15 PM
With markets, corporate concentration and restrictive zoning each cost households an estimated thousands of dollars each year.

Estimates running that high show how poorly our markets are structured. Our Framework digs into the major arguments on how this drives costs. /3
October 22, 2025 at 5:15 PM
There's good reason so much analysis on affordability is done sector-by-sector. But by stepping back, you can see commonalities across the biggest contributors, and that it's driven by bad market structures and mismatched spending.

Or: broken markets and broken incomes. /2
October 22, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Reposted by Mike Konczal
also, what an image. the president demolishing a portion of a humble people’s house to make room for his royalist monstrosity
October 20, 2025 at 6:54 PM