Correct, I replied to Cameron’s two comments.

Yeah, guy. That’s what I said. Great close reading skills.

Hi, it’s 2025.

You mean because I didn’t make every possible argument against every form of violence, and kept my comments to the context at hand, I’m what?

Would you like to know what I think about the death penalty, or you want to just make assumptions that allow you to avoid addressing the substance?

Um Yes. Absolutely. Loudly and regularly. I draw the line at advocating for violence. If you don’t, that’s a choice.

Saying that it’s time for guillotine is advocating violence, in my opinion. Your gleeful response to my objection to that language certainly counts as co-signing advocating violence. If that’s not what you meant, you might want to reconsider your earlier post.

Sure! Rationalize it all you want. If you can say the following out loud to the people whose respect means the most to you, you’re right: “I believe it’s ok to advocate for the violent death of people i view as abhorrent.”

Yes, if you’re content to be one minuscule better than the insurrectionists that stormed our nation’s capital, you’re absolutely right.

This is irresponsible. You should delete it.

🤣🤣🤣