michael 🇺🇸 🇺🇦
banner
monkeydesign.bsky.social
michael 🇺🇸 🇺🇦
@monkeydesign.bsky.social
SoCal 🐸.
Elated Husband. Dog Lover. Engineer. Law Geek. Tinkerer.

Gaga over Raspberry Pi, ESP-8266, & kindred platforms. Micropython acolyte.

One of 75,017,613 that voted against the vulgar tyrant.
Stop it. We're better than that.

I loathe the entire Trump administration.
And, I'm prone to name-calling myself.

But regardless of our personal religious views, denigrating Islam and its followers is not the path forward.
December 9, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Thanks for your reporting.

This rollercoaster must be excruciating for the Ukrainian people.
Same with the teasing of Tomahawk, Taurus, Intel, . . .

My country is lost in the wilderness.
I hope the UK and EU quickly arrive at principled decisions.
December 9, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Neato -- Fond memories.

Glad we didn't have this stuff:
December 9, 2025 at 5:40 AM
I thought I had to know, as well.

Largely juvenile and inane, but the salient part begins @ 8:10.
www.thebulwark.com/p/the-laura-...
The Laura Loomer / MTG / Arby’s Scandal That No One Asked For
Tim Miller, Sam Stein and Will Sommer take on Laura Loomer’s outrageous deposition — complete with roast beef insults, Trump affair rumors, and her vicious feud with Marjorie Taylor Greene.
www.thebulwark.com
December 9, 2025 at 2:35 AM
You're right. (Impressive credentials, BTW)
I haven't been PIC for a while, so I was unaware.

Here's what I learned:
Biden changed it to "Missions" in 2021.
Trump changed it back to "Airmen" in Feb. 2025 (EO 14172).

A Federal Register mess across agencies.

No idea what ICAO thinks of our folley.
November 22, 2025 at 8:25 AM
Actually, after reading some of your replies to others, I see more heat than light.

We're done.

Peace out.
November 13, 2025 at 5:27 PM
We disagree here.

Legislation *can* burden/benefit specific individuals to address unique circumstances.

But, I hope you're reading prevails.

I think we agree on the larger issue --
The Trump administration is corrupt, and we're all disgusted with their antics.
November 13, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Ex post facto wasn't determinative in Fletcher.
Opinion discusses it briefly re *criminal* conduct by GA legislators.

Despite corrupt conduct (Yazoo Land Scandal), and ex post facto (Recinding act of 1796), opinion was firmly rooted in Art. 1, Sec. 10, "Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts".
November 13, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Start here if you're super curious:

supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...
Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386 (1798)
Calder v. Bull
supreme.justia.com
November 13, 2025 at 4:50 AM
Not exactly.
For over 200 years the federal courts have interpreted the ex post facto clause to apply to *criminal*, but not *civil* actions.
Expect these senators to get paid.

Earliest case: Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386 (1798).
More recently are dozens of CERCLA/RCRA (Superfund) liability cases.
November 13, 2025 at 4:49 AM
Incisive reporting.
Two thumbs up.

Always appreciated.
May you heal quickly.
November 12, 2025 at 5:04 PM
It seemed so plausible. . .

Your post was the first that caused me to question it.
Thank you.

mediabiasfactcheck.com/fact-check-d...
Fact Check - Did Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy say pilots should “go with their gut feelings”?
Media Bias Fact Check (MBFC) publishes daily vetted fact checks from verified IFCN-approved sources. Each claim is independently reviewed for accuracy and
mediabiasfactcheck.com
November 12, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Gotcha.
Thank you.
November 11, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Wild guess of P&G's costs to file?
Presumably, they'd defend their IP for a tidy sum, too.

I've seen others' wavy edged sticky notes and paper towels in the wild. I'm indifferent to the precise wave shapes.

Can you help a naive consumer understand what advantages this filing conferrs? Thanks.
November 11, 2025 at 5:57 PM
I'm not certain. I think it's automated and was triggered by the swastika symbol in your intro (despite following an Anti). Mere removal may or may not remove you from the list.

I typed skywatch.blue into the search box, and found posts on how others have dealt with similar.
skywatch.blue
November 7, 2025 at 7:52 AM
I think I know who the second bottle is for.
I've got one too.
November 7, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Dodd created exceptions for Hussain, Milosovic, bin Laden, and some 2002 contemporaries. Later it was extended to include others.

But, Netanyahu clearly falls within 22 USC 7432(3)

Accordingly, per §7422(a)(2)(A)(ii), ASPA can't be waived.

Regardless, city mayors can't cooperate; §7423(b).
November 6, 2025 at 2:30 PM
It's not about foreign nationals, per se.
As Olga explained, it's about not cooperating with ICC.

Check the first paragraph (Intent & Analysis):
law.stanford.edu/wp-content/u...

Or, if you're super curious, here's 22 U.S.C. 81 §7423:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
November 6, 2025 at 5:02 AM
AirheadsForCuomo.Com is still available.
November 5, 2025 at 2:27 AM
They're perfect.

Attitude. Cavort with attitude.
November 1, 2025 at 1:40 AM
"I have a wide stance"
-- Republican Senator Larry Craig
November 1, 2025 at 1:23 AM
Clever. That'd never occur to me.

But, I'm kinda square -- I'll stick to Datasheets & App Notes.
October 31, 2025 at 11:46 PM
I'm thankful that you did.
Sometimes I need a gentle nudge.

Enjoy your day, as well.
October 31, 2025 at 7:39 PM
I still read the questions differently.

Not the point -- I was an ass in the way that I responded.

My apologies to Eric.
I'll try to do better.
October 31, 2025 at 7:34 PM