Carlos Perez
banner
modmale.bsky.social
Carlos Perez
@modmale.bsky.social
Student of Mod-ology since 1987. Digs sharp style, clean design, hip tunes, good books and films, and a nice glass of wine.
I remember when this first came out and how excited we were with 'Kick out the style! Bring back the jam!' thinking we were hip to what they were saying.
December 9, 2025 at 5:59 PM
Reposted by Carlos Perez
These were people already approved to be naturalized, yet they were stopped solely because of their countries of origin. MAGA keeps saying, “If they wanted to be in this country, they should have done it the right way.” Well, they did. And the administration still blocked them. Cruelty is the point.
Immigrants Approved for Citizenship ‘Plucked Out’ of Line Moments Before Pledging Allegiance: Report
Immigrants lined up to become U.S. citizens in Boston on Dec. 4 were pulled from line by USCIS officials moments before the ceremony. The incident comes after USCIS told employees to halt all immigrat...
people.com
December 8, 2025 at 3:50 PM
With a dash of Deco.
December 8, 2025 at 4:03 PM
We've got these two as prints. Love the Art Nouveau via 1920s via 1960s vibe of these.
December 8, 2025 at 4:03 PM
I mean...
December 6, 2025 at 2:25 AM
Gonna have to queue this up!
December 6, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Ha! That's probably why I'm more into old stuff. I don't have to worry about what might be coming next.
December 5, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Funny, I didn't get into them the first time around. I did have the Legal Man single simply because of sitar.

But one day, my not-yet-wife played them while I was doing dishes and, boom! I was hooked. Now... big fan of all their stuff! Got to see Stuart Murdoch on his book tour out here.
December 5, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Whoa!
December 5, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Took me a long time to land there but glad I did.
As We Go Along
YouTube video by The Monkees - Topic
m.youtube.com
December 5, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Reposted by Carlos Perez
As Justice Kagan begins her dissent by pointing out, what is even the point of trial, of fact-finding, of clear error, of standards of review, when the Supreme Court simply ignores every single part of that and decides everything purely on the papers without any real consideration of the facts?
December 4, 2025 at 11:08 PM