That’s how you can make sense of your research!

For a while I was disappointed that there wasn’t a common literature among researchers I was reading. But from there I learned a lot, and eventually found some of that common literature review.

But….why?

Might as well look at the abstract, email the author.

I mean: “why would i pay a college to submit my essay to chatgpt for me”

If you think about the Straussian, consensus liberal, or neoconservative critique of mid-century higher education practices and their promotion of the Great Books....AI would be a newer version of having students read tiny excerpts of books instead of more substantial sections.

First it was about speed
Then it was about privacy
Now it's about distraction-less browsing and usability

NOW, it's a pseudoscience because it's been debunked & is no longer mainstream scientific thinking. Calling historical eugenics a pseudoscience lets science & scientists of the past off the hook (Also, PS is more of a modern-day term. We had terms like "quackery" but eugenics was not that)

Boys then find themselves kicked out of school, thrown into juvie. The girls are presumed to not need any help, unless the instructor/admin "sees" a "problem."

None of this is helping kids, and it's all contributing to gendered and poor outcomes.

Boys can get "help" (effective or not) because they are more verbally and physically expressive. Girls, meanwhile, often do not receive adequate help because they are often internal with their mental health struggles. The former run into "tough love" discipline, the latter are often overlooked.