Great umbrella 👍

clearly hyperbole, though try asking GPT to formulate a model to address question. Then interact with it (correct it, guide it), and you'll see that it can do a decent job. GPT is baby AI. Just wait for next versions and ruptures e.g., ai-2027.com. It's just a matter of time.

Indeed, lots of types of incentives have been discussed, but nothing has really generalized. I wouldn't say that AI is crap, but rather that it needs to be guided. I do predict that it will increasingly aid reviewers and editors as well. Look back at this thread in 2030.

The BIG problem is that there are too many submissions compared to willing/qualified reviewers. I think that we will increasingly see AI "participating" in the review process.

I think that if a rejection is legitimate (qualified reviewers and good editor oversight), then there's no problem.

postmodern dr suess