Those are good ones. The Hogfather is another that you can find on my list.

talk of denaturalizing people who undermine domestic tranquility and reducing disruptive populations has a very anti- 1st-amendment vibe.

OK. They're starting to show some interest, too.

Promote judicial finality? Is that normally a goal of prosecutors? If so, does that reward defendants who draw out the process as long as possible?

"As well as his own legal advice "

Is that code for saying that his advice didn't agree with the advice of Blanche & Bove?

Do you have a link to the bsky thread mentioned in the article? (i.e. the one about DIY filters)

And the sort of immigration and visas that allow for cultural exchanges, too.

TLDR of the argument from pages 9-11 : Soros funded the case and Newsom liked the result, so, Checkmate, Libtards - it must be political.

(It is convenient that, so far in my reading, he throws a "I dissent" between each argument to help you know where one argument starts and stops.)

CNU's affordability maps are interesting to explore. Thank you for the tip.

He seems very interested in his hands.

Out of curiosity, where's the other Utah location?

Numbers 1 and 3 are covered, too -

Number 5 is bogus. The bill specifically only requires the release of unclassified docs.

(Note that this opens up other problems - I imagine Bondi has authority to slap CLASSIFIED on any of the docs that she wants.)

The question before the court: Do cruel & unusual punishments become less cruel when a prisoner asks for them?

Sounds like another Doctor Who Christmas special in the making.

Thanks for writing this. It's good to see a reporter at a mainstream paper who's understands the seriousness of this crisis.

It's remarkable to see a mainstream city paper article that demonstrates this understanding of these issues.

I'd like to take this as a hopeful sign that the winds are changing.

Maybe I just need a better grasp of how the bones all fit together and then it would click for me.