Miranda Fitch
@mirandafitch.bsky.social
Remember how you said the makeup artist said no bruising? You were lied to. You don’t have to admit it to me but maybe just realize your sources are horrible and you were duped. seriously just looking out for you right now and would love to know what source is spreading that lie?
June 10, 2025 at 5:11 AM
Remember how you said the makeup artist said no bruising? You were lied to. You don’t have to admit it to me but maybe just realize your sources are horrible and you were duped. seriously just looking out for you right now and would love to know what source is spreading that lie?
This was literally in the trial and these are the official court docs from a website run by a Depp supporter. deppdive.net/ws/Declarati... it’s deppdive.net
June 10, 2025 at 4:46 AM
This was literally in the trial and these are the official court docs from a website run by a Depp supporter. deppdive.net/ws/Declarati... it’s deppdive.net
Yup! The official transcript saying that 100k plus 250k came from AH.
June 10, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Yup! The official transcript saying that 100k plus 250k came from AH.
How do you know whose blood it was lol? Again, Dr. Michelle Jordan at Stanford confirmed they weren’t self-inflicted, as anyone with a brain can see.
June 4, 2025 at 9:37 PM
How do you know whose blood it was lol? Again, Dr. Michelle Jordan at Stanford confirmed they weren’t self-inflicted, as anyone with a brain can see.
Dr. Michelle Jordan at Stanford. Check out her credentials and then try to tell yourself you somehow know better than her.
June 4, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Dr. Michelle Jordan at Stanford. Check out her credentials and then try to tell yourself you somehow know better than her.
Yes? He dedicated pretty much all of his resources to doing so. Spent millions on lawsuits, bots, a disinformation campaign. He was obsessed with ruining her life and career. She tried to protect his abusive ass
June 2, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Yes? He dedicated pretty much all of his resources to doing so. Spent millions on lawsuits, bots, a disinformation campaign. He was obsessed with ruining her life and career. She tried to protect his abusive ass
From the guy who was like that sieg heil was accidental idk I’m autistic, posting 14 flags at 14:14 pm seems pretty intentional! Idk do they call this “duper’s delight”?
February 18, 2025 at 6:47 AM
From the guy who was like that sieg heil was accidental idk I’m autistic, posting 14 flags at 14:14 pm seems pretty intentional! Idk do they call this “duper’s delight”?
See here, Dr. Cowan and Dr. blaustein
January 18, 2025 at 7:02 PM
See here, Dr. Cowan and Dr. blaustein
The judge did consider it. Which you’d know if you read the judgment. The police said they were there for 45 min when time stamped footage shows they were there for less than 10. They had no body cams, took no notes & looked at photos of her clearly red/swollen face & said they didn’t see an injury
January 18, 2025 at 5:52 PM
The judge did consider it. Which you’d know if you read the judgment. The police said they were there for 45 min when time stamped footage shows they were there for less than 10. They had no body cams, took no notes & looked at photos of her clearly red/swollen face & said they didn’t see an injury
Quite clearly not, if you had bothered to read the judgment, the transcripts, the court documents, and looked into any of the evidence (which you clearly haven’t).
![set against
the abundance of evidence, including documentary evidence and
corroborative evidence from third parties including the Appellant himself, that the Appellant had assaulted Ms Heard. Unlike in Meek, this was not a pure "he said/she said" case in which Ms Heard's evidence was "virtually unsupported". As the judge noted at
(93], there were some 13 lever arch files of documents in the trial, and he was persuaded of Ms Heard's account not least because (at [577]):
There is a multiplicity of emails, texts and messages and diary entries in the papers before me. I have quoted some. Some, but by no means all, are from Ms Heard. I recognise, of course, that previous statements by her are not independent evidence of the truth of the allegations, yet they are not, on the other hand, inadmissible or irrelevant for that reason. There are also as I have shown sometimes statements from third parties which do corroborate her.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:hob43pjrtl7uahqdeyhjowpl/bafkreibnpcozuh6nctvf5fxy4g3kreq34abflpusmv7z4bc6xyao5ayode@jpeg)
January 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Quite clearly not, if you had bothered to read the judgment, the transcripts, the court documents, and looked into any of the evidence (which you clearly haven’t).
![A, 4 370(xxiii).
• In the High Court of Justice Confidential Annexe, the Court "accept[ed] this part of Ms. Heard's account," and "concluded] that Mr. Depp did commit the sexual assault alleged by the Defendants as part of Incident 8." Att. 1, 9 17.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:hob43pjrtl7uahqdeyhjowpl/bafkreifbgvf6tyklsbgnfkiumlyeax7ndyxrzhjpmoyocvyxbbfg7edkby@jpeg)
He did forum shop to find a place with the weakest anti-SLAPP laws in the country, though. And he used the UK trial as a dress rehearsal, changing out his stories and witnesses that didn’t work so well the first time. www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv...
January 14, 2025 at 3:49 PM
He did forum shop to find a place with the weakest anti-SLAPP laws in the country, though. And he used the UK trial as a dress rehearsal, changing out his stories and witnesses that didn’t work so well the first time. www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv...
Highly unlikely; it was her bed that only she was sleeping in and the dog has a history of pooping in the bed; here is the UK judge’s finding on that
![479. In his cross-examination, Mr Depp accepted that his sense of humour was 'niche'. It also had a lavatorial streak. On 11th October 2013 he had sent a text to Stephen Deuters which said (see file 6/119/F697.14),
'Will you squat in front of the door of the master bedroom and leave a giant coil of dookie so that Amber steps in it and thinks that one of the dogs, primarily Boo, has a major problem. It'll be funny!!!'
480. Mr Depp's belief that Ms Heard or one of her friends was responsible for leaving the faeces on the bed is relevant because (a) it led him to conclude that his marriage to Ms Heard could not continue and (b) it was the cause of part of the argument which subsequently took place on 21st May 2016. In my view, whether Ms Heard or one of her friends was in fact responsible is not important. It is remote from the central issue, namely whether Mr Depp assaulted Ms Heard. It is not even of significant relevance to whether Ms Heard assaulted Mr Depp. For what it is worth, I consider that it is unlikely that Ms Heard or one of her friends was responsible. Mr Depp had left that night for his property in Sweetzer. As long as he was away, it was Ms Heard who was likely to suffer from the faeces on the bed, not him.
It was, therefore, a singularly ineffective means for Ms Heard or one of her friends to 'get back' at Mr Depp. Other evidence in the case showed that Boo (one of the two dogs) had an incomplete mastery of her bowels after she had accidentally consumed some marijuana. Ms Heard gave evidence that Boo had in the past defecated on the bed and that she herself had cleaned it up rather than leave that task to Ms Vargas. On 29th October 2014, Ms Heard wrote in a text message to Kevin Murphy that (see file 7/3 (b)/H27.2),
'Last night she [Boo] shit on Johnny. While he was sleeping. Like all over him. Not exaggerating.'](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:hob43pjrtl7uahqdeyhjowpl/bafkreihyhmqxmpwnwxs7vukh4zenr4gp3uraheziortgx7crgorxs7yute@jpeg)
January 14, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Highly unlikely; it was her bed that only she was sleeping in and the dog has a history of pooping in the bed; here is the UK judge’s finding on that
…it’s literally right here
January 9, 2025 at 9:19 PM
…it’s literally right here
The judge listened to the tapes in the UK. It’s a marvel how you have gotten every single fact wrong. Depp injured his own finger as he was doing his favorite activity, smashing property in an impotent rage, as he admitted over and over. You believe in an absurd, illogical conspiracy theory
January 4, 2025 at 7:00 PM
The judge listened to the tapes in the UK. It’s a marvel how you have gotten every single fact wrong. Depp injured his own finger as he was doing his favorite activity, smashing property in an impotent rage, as he admitted over and over. You believe in an absurd, illogical conspiracy theory
![[11] Thereafter, however, the burden of proof is on the defendant newspaper to prove its defense; for example, that it published an honest opinion (section 3), [12] or published in the reasonable belief that it was in the public interest (section 4),[13] or that the allegations are substantially true (section 2).[14] Thus, The Sun had to reach the high bar of convincing the court that the allegations made by Heard that he was violent towards her were substantially true.
It did just that.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:hob43pjrtl7uahqdeyhjowpl/bafkreihkytmkaxite7famnvxkllg4qcvler5beod4wtw2ozd2l5ygizafe@jpeg)
No, it does not. Directly from the official judgment
January 4, 2025 at 6:40 PM
No, it does not. Directly from the official judgment
Just read his texts which were shown in the trial. He has serious rage and substance abuse issues
January 1, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Just read his texts which were shown in the trial. He has serious rage and substance abuse issues
![a. The Claimant's text to Dr Kipper just after the incident, on 7 March 2015, [File 7/5(b)/H30.6] "I am so very sad. I cut the top of my finger off. What should I do, except of course go to hospital. I'm so embarrassed for jumping into anything with her'. This admission that the Claimant had cut his own finger off came in a text in which he was referring to Ms Heard in insulting and demeaning language, so had no reason not to accuse her of cutting the finger if that had been true.
b. The absence of any reference to Ms Heard cutting off his finger in the Claimant's text to his sister after the incident saying he wanted a marriage annulment [3/464/23 - 3/465/9] [File 6/119/F697.60], and shortly afterwards another saying
"fucked up my finger pretty nasty", without any suggestion that Ms Heard was responsible [3/466/12-14] [File 6/119/F697.60].
c. The absence of any reference to Ms Heard cutting off his finger in a text to his friend Mr Bettany (who the Claimant accepted did not like Ms Heard) [vol 6/tab 119/p.64) [3/471/25-3/462/12], even though the text referred to having "just had" the tip of his finger "lopped off"
d. A text the Claimant sent to Dr Kipper [File 9/110/K107-8] [3/473/4-7] "Thank you for everything. I have chopped off my left middle finger as a reminder that I should never cut my finger off again."
170. The contemporaneous medical notes also support the Defendants' case on the finger injury:
a. The note of the doctor who attended the Claimant at the emergency room on 8
March, Dr Grant: "He sustained an injury to his right middle finger tonight after accidentally cutting it with a kitchen knife. He has an oblique de-tipping injury that commences distal to the DIPJ on the ulnar side and runs obliquely to the midline of the tip of the finger. Xray shows a comminuted # of the tuft and an oblique fracture more proximally suggestive a crushing mechanism." [File 4/133/F761] [3/469/25-3/470/8].
56](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:hob43pjrtl7uahqdeyhjowpl/bafkreieg3blhftdxpabnf6bek23n3azxmto77do2z56t4fzt7duuy6hu5u@jpeg)
Depp injured his own finger in an intoxicated rage, when he was committing 75k in property damage to his rental. He admitted to this many times.
January 1, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Depp injured his own finger in an intoxicated rage, when he was committing 75k in property damage to his rental. He admitted to this many times.
As it came out just today that the PR firm Depp used to smear Heard regularly works with the Daily Mail to plant false stories, as well as astroturf social media, I’m not going to put a lot of stock into that. That man said he got the dates mixed up under oath.
December 21, 2024 at 11:14 PM
As it came out just today that the PR firm Depp used to smear Heard regularly works with the Daily Mail to plant false stories, as well as astroturf social media, I’m not going to put a lot of stock into that. That man said he got the dates mixed up under oath.
I wonder why Depp would have had the timestamp from the Musk footage removed! Probably because it was proof he was surveilling her after the TRO.
December 21, 2024 at 11:08 PM
I wonder why Depp would have had the timestamp from the Musk footage removed! Probably because it was proof he was surveilling her after the TRO.
That doesn’t make any sense, as the same guy who testified to that said he never even saw Amber Heard ever until July 2015 and she was not a resident until March 2016 (so how could she have let musk in with a fob in 2015?) and when pressed on this he just said “I get the years messed up”
December 21, 2024 at 11:02 PM
That doesn’t make any sense, as the same guy who testified to that said he never even saw Amber Heard ever until July 2015 and she was not a resident until March 2016 (so how could she have let musk in with a fob in 2015?) and when pressed on this he just said “I get the years messed up”