AirPower (MIL-STD)
banner
mil-std.bsky.social
AirPower (MIL-STD)
@mil-std.bsky.social
Old radar types never die; they just phased array!

Aerospace, Defense and NatSec related content

#OpenSource. No affiliations to govt., media or industry
As captured by @CCFOC1, #AIM260 GS equipped a/c can be seen flying alongside a F35 on May 9. Both aircraft are participating in exercise Black Flag 25. Black Flag is an operational test-focused ex. that evaluates the suitability of emerging capabilities & tactics in operationally relevant scenarios
May 10, 2025 at 3:26 PM
For those who may have missed my prior #AIM260 #JATM thread -

bsky.app/profile/mil-...
Now that we know what #JATM looks like, some impressions 👇

🔸Significant ⬆️ in Solid Rocket Motor length vs AMRAAM (45%- 50 % of total length)

🔸Low drag wingless design w/o forward aero surfaces. Similar to early AMRAAM proposals from Raytheon & Northrop

🔸Multiple conformal antennas aft of seeker
May 10, 2025 at 12:13 PM
I should clarify, this is 'my first/closest look' of JATM GS. There's plenty of publicly available imagery of the AIM-260 guidance section going back several years. None of it surfaced in the media at the time even though it was openly available.

Another from 2021 -
www.flickr.com/photos/jetma...
CRJ700_N804X_2021-04-28-3
www.flickr.com
May 10, 2025 at 12:12 PM
While we have had acknowledgement of QF-16 FSAT flights to support development of the AIM-260A JATM going as far back as 2018-19, this most recent US Navy social media post appears to provide the first glimpse into #JATM - F/A-18 Super Hornet integration and test activities.
March 7, 2025 at 10:44 PM
That’s the mother of all mission creeps. JATM needs to be a better to significantly better AIM to defeat LO and ECM equipped threats at greater ranges than AMRAAM. That’s its purpose.
March 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Neither of those are its intended targets. It is replacing the Aim-120
March 3, 2025 at 1:35 PM
You can see the targeting devices are pretty prominently featured on the missile graphic just set of the seeker.
March 3, 2025 at 12:26 PM
It’s also confirmed to be largely of similar size to the AMRAAM so a 12 ft length and 7 dis is pretty much certain.
March 3, 2025 at 12:09 PM
Us Navy
March 3, 2025 at 11:53 AM
This combination of a low drag design (relative to AIM-120 etc), more advanced propulsion, and more volume for propellant should give JATM a significantly greater range (more importantly NEZ and endgame performance) than the AIM-120D though other range limitations still apply.
March 3, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Longer motor & ⬇️ drag may not be the only updates. USAF has been known to be researching focused lethality enhanced warheads that allows for controllable frag concentration. This may further ⬇️ weight allowing for weight parity with AMRAAM despite significantly ⬆️ propellant.
March 3, 2025 at 11:38 AM
A longer SRM motor is not the only thing going on with the JATM design shared in the graphic. It appears to be optimized for low drag. This would translate to ⬆️ performance relative to the AIM-120 for equivilant propellant/motor performance leaving even more in reserve.
March 3, 2025 at 11:38 AM
If we assume JATM has same drag of AMRAAM, and has a multi-pulse SRM with first pulse that consumes a similar amount of propellant, JATM would be able to obtain similar perf as AMRAAM while still maintaining > 1/3 (even adj. for more prop weight) of AIM120s propellent in reserve.
March 3, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Assuming JATM shares the 12 foot length of the AMRAAM, the SRM could be approximately 66 in - 70 in long. This puts it between 45% and 50% of the overall length of the weapon (LM's PAC3 MSE is 48%) and approximately 15-20 in longer than AIM-120. This should allow 30-40% more propellent.
March 3, 2025 at 11:38 AM
For reference, by FY27, the CCA R&D bill will exceed what the Air Force plans to spend on development of F-35 C2D2 / modernization which is expected to fall from about $1.2 Bn a year today to $980 MM in FY29. In Contrast, CCA R&D will exceed $1.5 Bn by FY27 and $3 Bn by FY28.
January 1, 2025 at 5:21 PM