The assumption that she has absolute authority over our communal resources is absurd.

She really does not seem to understand that Ruby Central exists in service to Ruby developers. It is an administrative role, not governing.

This is exactly why Sidekiq only ever specifies ">=" in its gemspec version constraints. As a library in your application, I'd rather be loose and assume compatibility so I don't force unnecessary upgrades on you.

If it makes sense, then why not have a public process which provides a peaceful transition of ownership? Why not fork? I think all of the maintainers would have been super happy to work under the Ruby org.

Which would be led by… hsbt. He’s the rubygems guy on ruby-core.

It was stolen by a member of ruby-core, hsbt. What can we do when ruby-core feels entitled to take projects from the people that have maintained them for years?

Those are fantastic, a natural in front of the camera.

The statement does not say he used it for twelve days. Reserve judgment, we’d all like the benefit of the doubt in the same situation.

Here's the explanation for the logs.

www.reddit.com/r/ruby/comme...

everything you write about Andre assumes bad faith. it's not a good look.

you won’t be able to read anything below 50pt font in 2-5 years