Apparently it has since become a stock image available from Getty Images & used in different articles.
www.nature.com/articles/434...
Apparently it has since become a stock image available from Getty Images & used in different articles.
www.nature.com/articles/434...
What we have here is something that has nothing to do with the article itself -- it's a detail of the so-called "Jehoash Inscription," a notorious forgery.
What we have here is something that has nothing to do with the article itself -- it's a detail of the so-called "Jehoash Inscription," a notorious forgery.
x.com/MichaelDPres...
x.com/MichaelDPres...
The reader will naturally infer that the expert is an archaeologist -- but when you follow the link you see the "expert" is actually a senior figure at a settler organization.
The reader will naturally infer that the expert is an archaeologist -- but when you follow the link you see the "expert" is actually a senior figure at a settler organization.
In this case, a significant percentage of the collectors and dealers driving the trade are Israelis
In this case, a significant percentage of the collectors and dealers driving the trade are Israelis
bsky.app/profile/mich...
www.timesofisrael.com/archaeologis...
bsky.app/profile/mich...
www.timesofisrael.com/archaeologis...
www.timesofisrael.com/archaeologis...
www.reaganlibrary.gov/exhibits/spe...
www.reaganlibrary.gov/exhibits/spe...
poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?...
poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?...
When Froehner wrote that the inscription was sent from Nazareth, it very likely was sent by the Koubourssys -- but they could have collected it almost anywhere in the southern Levant.
When Froehner wrote that the inscription was sent from Nazareth, it very likely was sent by the Koubourssys -- but they could have collected it almost anywhere in the southern Levant.
(Froehner, Mélanges d’épigraphie et d’archéologie XI-XXV, 1875)
(Froehner, Mélanges d’épigraphie et d’archéologie XI-XXV, 1875)