Diversity in axSpA drug trials is improving, but we still have a long way to go.
Greater inclusion by race, ethnicity, gender, and geography is important to ensure trial findings are more applicable to the patients we see in our clinics.
Diversity in axSpA drug trials is improving, but we still have a long way to go.
Greater inclusion by race, ethnicity, gender, and geography is important to ensure trial findings are more applicable to the patients we see in our clinics.
- 53 countries enrolled patients; but many regions had minimal participation in trials including Sub-Saharan Africa, South/Central Asia, Latin America and the MENA.
- 92% of trials conducted in high-income countries
- Only 2 trials conducted in low or low-middle income countries.
- 53 countries enrolled patients; but many regions had minimal participation in trials including Sub-Saharan Africa, South/Central Asia, Latin America and the MENA.
- 92% of trials conducted in high-income countries
- Only 2 trials conducted in low or low-middle income countries.
- Black patients made up just 1% of trial participants.
- Only 1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander ever recruited in an AxSpA drug trial!
- Representation of Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic/Latino participants improved (progress, but not enough).
- Black patients made up just 1% of trial participants.
- Only 1 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander ever recruited in an AxSpA drug trial!
- Representation of Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Hispanic/Latino participants improved (progress, but not enough).
- Female enrollment largely reflects disease prevalence (25% in AS, 48% in nr-axSpA)
- Trials reporting participant race rose from 9% (early 2000s) to 100% (~2020).
- Participant ethnicity reporting still lagging behind
- Female enrollment largely reflects disease prevalence (25% in AS, 48% in nr-axSpA)
- Trials reporting participant race rose from 9% (early 2000s) to 100% (~2020).
- Participant ethnicity reporting still lagging behind