He thinks one of his children will be if he's not?

I'm not a Nixon fan, but I will say I've mellowed on him over the decades as his successes have proven durably impressive and his excesses increasingly outshadowed.

Basically, a drive-by shooting.

Is a civil case a better path (sort of like with OJ)?

Professor @antheabutler.bsky.social wrote a book about this not so long ago...

www.amazon.com/White-Evange...

I'm in the future district 1, but not the current version. There's a massive amount of musical chairs going on.

The cow is clearly thinking: "I went on a walk today and saw an Amy."

How about for a danish?

You're probably saved by the cat's benevolent, if somewhat self-serving, rule over the household.

Interesting idea for a "The Matrix" reboot.

The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind

That was my second favorite line from the paper.

Dropped in intensity.

Shakemap has just just outside of felt zone.

A lot of excitement from the phone for not a lot of excitement happening IRL.

One rule of life that seldom fails me: arrogance is a cover for incompetence.

The really interesting thing is that it generated a whole sort of "lessons learned" response about how it needs to improve.

But that learning is completely ephemeral, and the next conversation I have with ChatGPT won't remember this whatsoever. It has no way to honor that promise.

The absolute certitude it develops about its hallucinated beliefs is unfathomable to a real human who has enough sense to know that when a conversation gets wrapped around the axle there's a reason for that you need to figure out.

People often think that LLMs have some sort of human reasoning, but any human would know that if you keep getting told you're lying about something that you should double check your answer.

In my case, it was easy to rub its nose in its poop, because the conversation was all in history to see.