"Ethnic cleansing" is right there waiting.

But it's how the neo-Confederates have defined taxation, and the so-called "liberal media" accepted that framing, so here we are.

"Critics say" implies that there's a controversy or two legitimate sides to a story, but only Republicans get that benefit of the doubt. The naked children, the racial sorting, the zero arrests, and the doubtless high dollar cost of the high profile raid are all *objective facts*.

Notice that conservatives never get the "raising questions" framing that suggests that their actions are objectively bad.

"Noem's high profile raid cost $x and led to children being zip-tied naked outdoors while their neighbors were sorted by race but led to no arrests, raising questions about..."

Neither does the US Constitution.

That’s one the many problems with today’s media. They still invite this pig on their panels like he’s an outside observer when he’s neck deep in the problem.

What's the over/under that the cop used the word "boy" when addressing the player?

Let justice be done though the heavens fall.