Very cool! I wonder if this is also applicable to other areas where trust plays a role such trust in democracy. Would stronger involvement in political decision making than sole voting (e.g. via citizens' juries/assemblies, referendums, etc) increase trust in democracy?
December 9, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Very cool! I wonder if this is also applicable to other areas where trust plays a role such trust in democracy. Would stronger involvement in political decision making than sole voting (e.g. via citizens' juries/assemblies, referendums, etc) increase trust in democracy?
My take: If even severe local disasters don't spark lasting shifts, relying on awareness and voluntarism alone is risky. Sustainability transitions likely need mandatory measures, e.g., carbon prices, phase-outs, binding standards, alongside continued awareness.
December 4, 2025 at 6:26 PM
My take: If even severe local disasters don't spark lasting shifts, relying on awareness and voluntarism alone is risky. Sustainability transitions likely need mandatory measures, e.g., carbon prices, phase-outs, binding standards, alongside continued awareness.
Takeaway: No broad, durable shifts in climate attitudes or behaviors; prosocial responses are uneven. We need longer tracking, clearer attribution tests, subgroup analysis, and objective behavioral/administrative data alongside surveys.
December 4, 2025 at 6:26 PM
Takeaway: No broad, durable shifts in climate attitudes or behaviors; prosocial responses are uneven. We need longer tracking, clearer attribution tests, subgroup analysis, and objective behavioral/administrative data alongside surveys.
Pro-sociality: While disasters can spark solidarity, empathy, and reciprocity, we found only limited, mixed effects on donations, volunteering, and trust. No uniform rise in "giving." Direct damage mattered, but not in a simple, uniformly positive way.
December 4, 2025 at 6:26 PM
Pro-sociality: While disasters can spark solidarity, empathy, and reciprocity, we found only limited, mixed effects on donations, volunteering, and trust. No uniform rise in "giving." Direct damage mattered, but not in a simple, uniformly positive way.
Climate attitudes & action: Across 3 national surveys (N=13,754), flood-exposed regions showed no broad, lasting shifts in climate attitudes, self-reported green behavior, or policy support. Far-off disasters feel distant, but even local catastrophes don't automatically drive lasting change.
December 4, 2025 at 6:26 PM
Climate attitudes & action: Across 3 national surveys (N=13,754), flood-exposed regions showed no broad, lasting shifts in climate attitudes, self-reported green behavior, or policy support. Far-off disasters feel distant, but even local catastrophes don't automatically drive lasting change.
Somewhat surprising to me that they decided to inflate the visual representation of difference given that the difference is quite large (increase 100% inside vs decrease 50% outside).
August 21, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Somewhat surprising to me that they decided to inflate the visual representation of difference given that the difference is quite large (increase 100% inside vs decrease 50% outside).
Totally agree! We looked at *technological optimism* (building on the framework) among COP delegates and how it connects to climate policies, especially lower CO₂ pricing. Turns out, putting too much faith in tech solutions can really slow down ambition. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Totally agree! We looked at *technological optimism* (building on the framework) among COP delegates and how it connects to climate policies, especially lower CO₂ pricing. Turns out, putting too much faith in tech solutions can really slow down ambition. www.nature.com/articles/s41...