Matt Winning
@mattywin.bsky.social
Climate change comedian 🌍 Lecturer in Economics of Sustainability @UCL.ac.uk 🏴 Author of 'Hot Mess' 📖 Hosted BBC Radio 4's 'Net Zero: A Very British Problem' 📻
www.mattwinning.com
www.mattwinning.com
Haha I think you can spot it in the background of various episodes
November 23, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Haha I think you can spot it in the background of various episodes
Reposted by Matt Winning
“I haven’t felt that good since Steven Thompson interrupted the post-match analysis to confirm that Belarus had held on for a draw in Copenhagen”
November 15, 2025 at 9:54 PM
“I haven’t felt that good since Steven Thompson interrupted the post-match analysis to confirm that Belarus had held on for a draw in Copenhagen”
I imagine there will have been pressure put on them to do this from some large country, wonder who?
November 12, 2025 at 10:49 AM
I imagine there will have been pressure put on them to do this from some large country, wonder who?
I'm aware of all his points, having, unlike him, worked on climate for several decades.
This thread explains it all better than I could bsky.app/profile/keta...
TLTR: he is arguing against noone & simply wants more money for innovation when we can already do majority of work with electrification
This thread explains it all better than I could bsky.app/profile/keta...
TLTR: he is arguing against noone & simply wants more money for innovation when we can already do majority of work with electrification
notes on gatesnotes, in a thread
"A new way to look at the problem" - er, no, he's been running this line for DECADES
On the headline: you can absolutely guarantee anyone presenting themselves as telling tough, hard truths is about to deliver some self-aggrandising nonsense
"A new way to look at the problem" - er, no, he's been running this line for DECADES
On the headline: you can absolutely guarantee anyone presenting themselves as telling tough, hard truths is about to deliver some self-aggrandising nonsense
October 30, 2025 at 2:59 PM
I'm aware of all his points, having, unlike him, worked on climate for several decades.
This thread explains it all better than I could bsky.app/profile/keta...
TLTR: he is arguing against noone & simply wants more money for innovation when we can already do majority of work with electrification
This thread explains it all better than I could bsky.app/profile/keta...
TLTR: he is arguing against noone & simply wants more money for innovation when we can already do majority of work with electrification
This single sentence makes me bang my head off the table. Who in the blue f**k thinks there is "too much" focus on near-term emissions.
October 30, 2025 at 2:49 PM
This single sentence makes me bang my head off the table. Who in the blue f**k thinks there is "too much" focus on near-term emissions.
My problem is summed up in this sentence:
"To be clear: Climate change is a very important problem. It needs to be solved, along with other problems like malaria and malnutrition"
As if climate change doesn't cause malaria and malnutrition. He doesn't appear to understand systemic thinking
"To be clear: Climate change is a very important problem. It needs to be solved, along with other problems like malaria and malnutrition"
As if climate change doesn't cause malaria and malnutrition. He doesn't appear to understand systemic thinking
October 29, 2025 at 2:55 PM
My problem is summed up in this sentence:
"To be clear: Climate change is a very important problem. It needs to be solved, along with other problems like malaria and malnutrition"
As if climate change doesn't cause malaria and malnutrition. He doesn't appear to understand systemic thinking
"To be clear: Climate change is a very important problem. It needs to be solved, along with other problems like malaria and malnutrition"
As if climate change doesn't cause malaria and malnutrition. He doesn't appear to understand systemic thinking
Money, time, carbon, family, distance
October 29, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Money, time, carbon, family, distance
