Reposted by Matt Hannah🍁
Thank you @emilylowan.bsky.social for the correction.
But it’s not “semantics” to distinguish between repealing DRIPA vs revising to ensure it is interpreted in its original intent, especially since the Greens fully supported it with that intent. But the correction is still appreciated.
But it’s not “semantics” to distinguish between repealing DRIPA vs revising to ensure it is interpreted in its original intent, especially since the Greens fully supported it with that intent. But the correction is still appreciated.
December 9, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Thank you @emilylowan.bsky.social for the correction.
But it’s not “semantics” to distinguish between repealing DRIPA vs revising to ensure it is interpreted in its original intent, especially since the Greens fully supported it with that intent. But the correction is still appreciated.
But it’s not “semantics” to distinguish between repealing DRIPA vs revising to ensure it is interpreted in its original intent, especially since the Greens fully supported it with that intent. But the correction is still appreciated.