Matthew Stiegler
@matthewstiegler.bsky.social
Appellate lawyer, president of Third Circuit Bar Association, former prosecutor, fellow of American Academy of Appellate Lawyers. Boring until fascism.
Views here: just mine.
Views here: just mine.
You’re significantly more expert on Scotus than I am. My starting point in this grant is deep pessimism.
November 10, 2025 at 4:31 PM
You’re significantly more expert on Scotus than I am. My starting point in this grant is deep pessimism.
Around these parts I see simply “ECF No. 2 at 123” in briefs way more than I see Bluebook format.
November 10, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Around these parts I see simply “ECF No. 2 at 123” in briefs way more than I see Bluebook format.
Potentially?
November 10, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Potentially?
(I’ll save you the googling, I’m 53.)
November 10, 2025 at 2:46 PM
(I’ll save you the googling, I’m 53.)
Just use the retirement letter tool. It’s past time.
November 10, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Just use the retirement letter tool. It’s past time.
November 10, 2025 at 2:14 PM
I yap a lot about institutional culture. It’s why I knew beforehand that federal judges wouldn’t easily cave to Trump or Scotus.
I don’t know how or why, but the institutional culture of the Senate seems irredeemably wrecked. It’s rendered them all a pack of sniveling ninnies.
I don’t know how or why, but the institutional culture of the Senate seems irredeemably wrecked. It’s rendered them all a pack of sniveling ninnies.
November 10, 2025 at 2:13 PM
I yap a lot about institutional culture. It’s why I knew beforehand that federal judges wouldn’t easily cave to Trump or Scotus.
I don’t know how or why, but the institutional culture of the Senate seems irredeemably wrecked. It’s rendered them all a pack of sniveling ninnies.
I don’t know how or why, but the institutional culture of the Senate seems irredeemably wrecked. It’s rendered them all a pack of sniveling ninnies.
It was implied! But it was not inferred.
November 10, 2025 at 2:03 PM
It was implied! But it was not inferred.
Reposted by Matthew Stiegler
I admire what @design-law.bsky.social and other lawyers here are doing demanding Schumer be replaced. Speaking up against a sitting Senate leader isn’t some clever legal career move. Shows a lot more than being the 185th lawyer to call a university cowardly.
March 21, 2025 at 12:22 PM
I admire what @design-law.bsky.social and other lawyers here are doing demanding Schumer be replaced. Speaking up against a sitting Senate leader isn’t some clever legal career move. Shows a lot more than being the 185th lawyer to call a university cowardly.
Mighty impressive show of support for your position, Senator.
November 10, 2025 at 1:43 AM
Mighty impressive show of support for your position, Senator.