Yep, I agree it's not the best wording.

The goal isn't just 2 points, the goal is 3 points. In the case of getting the first 2 point conversion, you wouldn't go for the second 2 point conversion. You'd then kick an extra point to win the game. Kicking two extra points gets you to overtime.

So this is AI, huh.

It's replaced 👍 in nearly all of my text reactions. Game changer

This is the way (assuming you gave the space)

Yeah I'm not sure how "one big bullsh*t bill" hasn't been taken off yet. It's right there.

On top of all the dumb here, a "direct inverse" correlation is not a thing. Correlations can be called direct (positive, X and Y increase together) or inverse (negative, as X increases Y decreases). But not what he said.

Data Analytics, too? Wow.

To get to a constitutional crisis, you first need to get halfway there, and then of the remaining distance we need to go half of that, and then half of that, and so on infinitely, so it's actually impossible to get all the way there. Nothing to worry about.

I'd bet they know very little, if anything at all about me. Therefore I am the most dangerous. Got it.

This is me at 41

A third round could be anything...it could even be a Geno Smith

Any crude whatever they apply is an "algorithm" to find anything they don't like, which is their eyes is "waste" so yeah algorithms finding watste