Mathiev Nancel
mathiev.bsky.social
Mathiev Nancel
@mathiev.bsky.social
HCI researcher, amateur sculptor, skydiving beginner, social media lurker.
Totally missed out on Twitter, but I'm definitely enjoying the comparison with FB.
Is there a website for this? Or is it a Bluesky exclusive?
February 12, 2026 at 8:24 AM
Would love to read about the writing of a certain duel scene...
February 2, 2026 at 11:07 PM
No Sausage for Old Men
January 30, 2026 at 4:01 AM
The people with mental illnesses are the French you made along the way. Or something.
January 27, 2026 at 8:09 PM
What mésange?
January 27, 2026 at 11:50 AM
*at the turn?
December 31, 2025 at 12:52 PM
That would be a neat TTRPG idea.
Lead with the weird sound coming from some indefinite direction, describing it as well as one can without using the term "flip flop"; then after a short chase, at the turning of a corridor, the Creature. The Centiflop. The Coolipede. The Sand Stalker.
December 31, 2025 at 12:51 PM
*outside decorations, too
December 23, 2025 at 12:04 PM
Considering what passes for class in his world, I'm imagining tacky gilded decorations and unprecedentedly incompetent chains of command.
December 23, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Hardwood floors.
December 14, 2025 at 9:22 AM
But when I took to My Hero Academia, very late in the game yet still before it ended, I could binge chapters like a madman, all until that last-published one at the time. Suddenly, I had to wait!
Basically, it's an inertia thing. The faster and the longer I go, the more violent the crash.
December 8, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Ah, but I think I'm integrating in that notion the fact that I could read a lot in one go, entirely oblivious of when I would be caught up. I'm up to date with OP as well, and I've been so for years, so I'm progressing at the speed of the releases: no wall per se...
December 8, 2025 at 11:15 PM
- Parents Have to Choose Between Offsprings
- This is why we can't have good things (i.e. humanity ruins a great opportunity, be it science-sharing aliens or the second coming)
- Trolley Solutions
December 8, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Reposted by Mathiev Nancel
I'm not a native English speaker, but I've often found myself lacking an idiom for "that time when you're cruising through a story and abruptly hit the last published chapter/page/episode, even though the story ain't over." Always feels like hitting a wall, especially since I rarely see it coming.
December 8, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Event(ful) horizon?
Recency wall?
Present collision?
Wavefiction collapse?
December 8, 2025 at 10:51 PM
I'm not a native English speaker, but I've often found myself lacking an idiom for "that time when you're cruising through a story and abruptly hit the last published chapter/page/episode, even though the story ain't over." Always feels like hitting a wall, especially since I rarely see it coming.
December 8, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Looks like someone forgot the Great Irish Spring Depression of 1962.
November 25, 2025 at 6:34 AM
Maybe thinking just isn't the Great Threshold we want it to be.
November 25, 2025 at 6:29 AM
I think we've got it backwards. (Lukewarm now:) For centuries we've so proudly fancied ourselves as the only beings that "think" (🤷‍♂️) that we've internalized it as "anything that can think is superior, like us", and that oversimplification makes us now fret over whether computers can do so.
November 25, 2025 at 6:29 AM
I don't think I've seen many (confident) definitions of "thinking" or "intelligence" recently. Could have missed some, but I suspect that people got careful about those, because recent AI (even pre-LLM) has shown how quickly those goalposts may need to be moved.
November 25, 2025 at 6:29 AM
I absolutely agree, but that falls into the yes-buts IMO. There existed a time where smart people would have laughed at the idea of a computer beating a grandmaster. I suspect that it's only when it became clear that it *could* happen, that the question got demoted to just a scale problem.
November 25, 2025 at 6:29 AM
Chess, Turing test, poetry, music... every time we make computers pass these thresholds, we come up with a new "well yes but." To me they can "think"--according to past criteria, and in 20 years they will "think" according to today's criteria.
What matters is that this does not make them our equal.
November 24, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Tepid take: I don't have a strong opinion on whether computers can think BECAUSE I lack a convincing definition of "think." We keep moving the goalposts about what's a meaningful difference between human and machine thinking-cognition-intelligence-whatever.
November 24, 2025 at 4:58 PM
be there in 10.
November 24, 2025 at 4:31 PM