It in part builds on this work about housing as a determinant of health:
www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...

We highlight the need for housing policy to be leveraged to meet the health challenge of climate change and caution against the pitfalls of reactive and selective adaptation that leave vulnerable communities susceptible.

It explores how climate change acts as a multiplier, intensifying health risks for people in poor-quality or insecure housing. And how climate-related housing vulnerability is rooted not only in poorly adapted physical structures but also the social organisation of housing

This builds on, in part, our previous work, published in The Lancet Planetary Health, that mapped the social vulnerability indicators used in the health and climate change literature:

www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...

That's exactly my problem at the moment. It's extremely frustrating

A linked commentary piece by Sarah R Lowe & Dana Rose Garfin describes the study as "perhaps the most rigorous study on successive climate-related disaster exposure to date" and "a major contribution to the literature on climate change and mental health." www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...

I thought they accepted non-lecia cameras in the slections, just not the mastershots

I was reading Thomas Piketty's A Brief History of Equality recently and he goes into how even in well-funded public systems in Europe, relatively privileged people still get the benefit of a disproportionate amount of public funding. I have no doubt that would be the case in Australia as well.

Some newer work building off this review: pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/we-...

op-ed off the back of the article: thefifthestate.com.au/columns/spin...