Fate of the Old Republic and Divinity 3 are acceptable consolation prizes, however.

Glad everyone in this thread seems to be on the same page about "Queer up" going kinda hard.

They even sold a figure of her before the reveal lmao

then they wouldn't have anything to do with it. "References" or otherwise. I know I'm not out here using artists I morally object to as refs for my artwork.

It's absolutely beyond parody that this is their excuse.

They just favorite them as "references"? Man, come on, surely you don't think everyone's stupid enough to buy that. I really hope you aren't either.

Again, Ludis isn't shy about calling his stuff cub. If they really want "nothing to do" with anyone associated with it-/

So are we just ignoring the inconvenient screenshots of proof everyone's been posting in the thread?

It's extremely amusing that you ask for proof, then immediately stop replying when people provide it.

Not imply that people who like something harmless I don't like are "vile" for a start.

Or panic deleting my Inkbunny faves when people start pointing out they're full of the cub art I'm oh so valiantly crusading against.

There's other examples as well lmao. There's also questionable stuff inside of Wuffster's library.

It's literally just art. I don't care and I'm tired of this weird witchhunt and just want people to move on.

>Charry literally named no one

Yeah you typically don't do that when you do a virtue signaling vague post.

No one cares that you partner likes cub art. Unlike you we don't cast moral aspersions on others because of drawings. We have a problem with the hypocrisy and performative clout sharking.

>You will note that the stuff from ludis is not sexual and avoids anything sexualising (sic) minors

Sure bro. It's nonsexual, purely safe for work "Squishy Horny Humpy Time"

For someone apparently so up in arms about cub art, they sure do like a lot of Ludis' stuff. Someone who's absolutely not shy about calling his art 'cub' publicly.