This is so bad I understood it as Win-Draw-Loss, despite reading the words. It took several attempts to actually get my brain to line up the words on the screen to the graphic

They can be used as Possessed now (which got new bigger models), but if you only had the 2 from the Greater Possessed then that isn't enough

Hey, they make great Gal Vorbak for Horus Heresy! But yeah, I don't think I ever used those models as they were designed, and they don't make a legal unit of alternatives by themselves

We know by now that it looks spectacularly stupid when it goes wrong, but that brief moment of hope they gave us on day 1 was so unfamiliar!

You can't use their own rules against them! Those rules aren't meant for *their* kind of people, only *other* protesters!

It "logically" follows from a position of "This amount doesn't let you afford X, Y, Z, so anything less isn't actually worse off" as long as you forget that other needs (like food) exist

"I wish mine had gone this well"?

How can you possibly believe that a 150% increase in income doesn't have much impact to QoL? The ONLY way I can make that make sense is if the baseline is already far more than enough, which is clearly not true

Budget, cricket, or something else?

"Gyrostabilised monorail" is the sort of phrase I associate with Warhammer 40k when they're trying to make something sound higher-tech than it is

The time before that, it just gave me a vague answer that was practically meaningless. In the context of when something in WW2 happened, "in the early 1940s" doesn't really narrow it down much 😂

The last time I remember using it, it gave me the specific answer to my question, but it was wrong! In fairness, it also pointed out that the value it gave me was likely wrong, so it gave me some alternatives. Those were also wrong, and looked completely made up to me

This is one of the reasons I like single player games. I don't need to worry whether not being 'optimal' will make things harder for my friends (some of whom care much more about that)

Wait, he was kicked out of the Tories for racist tweets, and then didn't join Reform? Did their recruiters miss it?

Is this the record number of casualties caused by a drink-driving (or drink-sailing, I guess) incident?

What point am I missing? My view of it is that nationalists making bad-faith arguments is bad, but I think it's worth recognising that they'll try to make those points, and that we should make it as hard as possible for them to do so

That only helps if you know the significance of Hans Frank or Generalgouvernement, and I'm not sure how well known those are to the average member of the public. Though presumably somewhat better in Poland, I'll admit. But why make it easier for the nationalists?